<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Green Blog &#187; waste generation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-blog.org/tag/waste-generation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-blog.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:58:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canada scores badly in environmental ranking</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/11/10/canada-scores-badly-in-environmental-ranking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/11/10/canada-scores-badly-in-environmental-ranking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference Board of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water usage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo credit: Яick Harris A new environmental study ranks Canada as one of the worst developed countries in the world. The study has been done by the Conference Board of Canada, an independent and not-for-profit applied research organization in Canada. &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/11/10/canada-scores-badly-in-environmental-ranking/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="flickr"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/37153080@N00/102423105/" title="Lake St. Peter Pan/HDR" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/19/102423105_6ef8c2b1a5_m.jpg" alt="Lake St. Peter Pan/HDR" border="0" /></a><br /><small><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/" title="Attribution-ShareAlike License" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.green-blog.org/wp-content/plugins/photo-dropper/images/cc.png" alt="Creative Commons License" border="0" width="16" height="16" align="absmiddle" /></a> Photo credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/37153080@N00/102423105/" title="Яick Harris" target="_blank">Яick Harris</a></small></div>
<p>A <a href="http://www.conferenceboard.ca/press/newsrelease/09-47.aspx">new environmental study</a> ranks <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/10/23/canada-re-elects-climate-wrecker-stephen-harper/">Canada</a> as one of the worst developed countries in the world. The study has been done by the <a href="http://www.conferenceboard.ca">Conference Board of Canada</a>, an independent and not-for-profit applied research organization in Canada.</p>
<p>According to the study Canada performed poorly and received D grades in the areas of waste generation, water usage, and greenhouse gas emissions. But the study still gave Canada an overall C grade because the country performed &#8220;better than average on other measures of environmental performance&#8221;. The study notes that &#8220;Canada is not taking the necessary steps toward environmental sustainability&#8221;, and that Canada &#8220;stands almost at the bottom of the pack&#8221; alongside with USA and Australia.</p>
<p><span id="more-635"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;We are among the world leaders in managing our forests, our air quality is good overall, and we have made progress on using energy efficiently,&#8221; said Len Coad, Director, Environmental Energy and Transportation Policy. &#8220;But we generate far too much waste, we still use water as though we have an unlimited supply, and our past record on greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) is terrible.&#8221;</p>
<p>The European countries Sweden, Finland, Norway and Switzerland earned A grades and was ranked as the best performers in almost all categories, while only &#8220;lagging&#8221; in &#8220;certain measures related to biodiversity and energy intensity&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/11/10/canada-scores-badly-in-environmental-ranking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

