<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Green Blog &#187; TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-blog.org/tag/tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-blog.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:58:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>US media censor out BBC TV &#8220;Frozen Planet&#8221; series climate change episode</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2011/11/25/us-media-censor-out-bbc-tv-frozen-planet-series-climate-change-episode/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2011/11/25/us-media-censor-out-bbc-tv-frozen-planet-series-climate-change-episode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr Gideon Polya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frozen Planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=3525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been reported by the UK New Statesman that the US will not air the &#8220;On Thin Ice&#8221; seventh episode of David Attenborough&#8217;s &#8220;Frozen Planet&#8221; BBC TV series about wildlife in the Arctic and Antarctica. The censored out final &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2011/11/25/us-media-censor-out-bbc-tv-frozen-planet-series-climate-change-episode/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been reported by the UK <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/star-spangled-staggers/2011/11/episode-climate-series-bbc">New Statesman</a> that the US will not air the &#8220;On Thin Ice&#8221; seventh episode of David Attenborough&#8217;s &#8220;Frozen Planet&#8221; BBC TV series about wildlife in the Arctic and Antarctica. The censored out final &#8220;On Thin Ice&#8221; seventh episode deals with the impact of man-made climate change, a matter controversial to a substantial body of anti-science, climate change denialist Americans. Samira Shackle in the New Statesman: </p>
<p><span id="more-3525"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>“Seven episodes of the multi-million-pound nature documentary series will be aired in Britain. However, the series has been sold to 30 world TV networks as a package of only six episodes. These networks then have the option of buying the seventh &#8220;companion&#8221; episode &#8212; which explores the effect man is having on the natural world &#8212; as well as behind the scenes footage. The six-episode series has been sold to 30 broadcasters, ten of which have declined to use the climate change episode, &#8220;On Thin Ice&#8221;, including the US. In America, the series is being aired by the Discovery channel, which insists that the final episode has been dropped because of a &#8220;scheduling issue&#8221;.”</p></blockquote>
<p>This is typical cowardly behavior by the BBC which has an appalling record of lying by omission and commission, most notoriously about the 12 million Muslim war-related deaths (about half of them children) in the 1990-2011 US Alliance War on Muslims (for details and documentation not reported by the holocaust-ignoring BBC see &#8220;<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/muslimholocaustmuslimgenocide/">Muslim Holocaust, Muslim Genocide</a>&#8220;), noting that holocaust ignoring is far, far worse than repugnant holocaust denial because at least the latter admits the possibility of public discussion). This Mainstream media lying by omission has dire consequences &#8211; thus it has just been announced that 2,500 child-killing US Marines are to be stationed in Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia where US lackey  Apartheid Australia is remorselessly continuing a racist process of <a href="https://sites.google.com/site/aboriginalgenocide/">Aboriginal Ethnocide and Aboriginal Genocide</a>.</p>
<p>What I suppose might well be  covered in the &#8220;On Thin Ice&#8221; seventh episode of David Attenborough&#8217;s &#8220;Frozen Planet&#8221; series could be related to the 4 October 2011 press release from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSDIC) which includes a map showing the approximate halving of <a href="http://nsidc.org/news/press/20111004_MinimumPR.html">Arctic summer sea ice extent</a> in recent decades and states: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;This September, sea ice covering the Arctic Ocean fell to the second-lowest extent in the satellite record, which began in 1979. Satellite data analyzed by NSIDC scientists showed that the sea ice cover narrowly avoided a new record low, while other data sources showed that ice extent matched or even fell below the record-setting low extent in 2007&#8230; NSIDC Director Mark Serreze said, &#8220;It looks like the spring ice cover is so thin now that large areas melt out in summer, even without persistent extreme weather patterns&#8230; The big summer ice loss this year is setting us up for another big melt year in 2012. We may be looking at an Arctic Ocean essentially free of summer ice only a few decades from now&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>The US, a major annual per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) polluter, has 4.4% of the world&#8217;s population, consumes 25% of its resources and is hell-bent on remorseless GHG pollution that is worsening a <a href="https://sites.google.com/site/climategenocide/">Climate Genocide</a> that is set to kill 10 billion non-Europeans this century.</p>
<p>The Murdoch Media Empire is pretty bad when it comes to perversion of the truth, especially in relation to irresponsible and anti-social man-made climate change denialism (and hence &#8220;<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/boycottmurdochmedia/">Boycott Murdoch Media</a>&#8220;) but other media are heavily involved also. Thus in Australia, where Murdoch Media have 70% of the city newspaper readership, I understand that it is the major national TV channel Channel 9 (non-Murdoch) that has purchased &#8220;Frozen Planet&#8221; &#8211; but apparently only the first 6 episodes (e.g. see its <a href="http://fixplay.ninemsn.com.au/frozenplanet">promotion here</a>).</p>
<p>This is yet another instance of the operation of what has been called Murdochracy (Big Money buys truth and votes) and Lobbyocracy (Big Money buys politicians and policy) in the Western democracies. In the West the 1% have substituted Murdochracy and Lobbyocracy for Democracy at the expense of the 99% and of rational risk management that is crucial for societal safety.</p>
<p>The WBGU that advises the German Government on climate change in 2009 estimated that for a 75% chance of avoiding a disastrous 2C temperature rise the world can emit no more than 600 billion tonnes of CO2 between 2010 and zero emissions in 2050. The climate criminal US is set to use up its &#8220;fair share&#8221; of this terminal global GHG pollution budget in about 2013. However it is estimated that Australia, an even worse per capita Greenhouse gas (GHG) polluter than the US, had already used up its “fair share” by mid-2011 and is now stealing the entitlement of wretchedly poor countries such as drought-devastated Somalia and inundation-threatened Bangladesh (see &#8220;<a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2011/08/01/shocking-analysis-by-country-of-years-left-to-zero-emissions/">Shocking analysis by country of years left to zero emissions</a>&#8220;).</p>
<p>The climate criminality of the US and its lackey Australia are revealed by the following 2005-2008 data on “annual per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) pollution” in units of “tonnes CO2-equivalent per person per year”: 0.9 (Bangladesh), 0.9 (Pakistan), 2.2 (India), less than 3 (many African and Island countries), 3.2 (the Developing World), 5.5 (China), 6.7 (the World), 11 (Europe), 16 (the Developed World), 27 (the US) and 30 (Australia; or 54 if Australia’s huge Exported CO2 pollution  is included) (see “<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/climategenocide/">Climate Genocide</a>”).</p>
<p>What can decent, pro-Planet  people do in the face of media censorship in the face of a worsening climate emergency? Decent people can (a) inform everyone they can about the threat and the Mainstream media censorship and (b) urge sanctions and boycotts against all people, politicians, countries and corporations  complicit in the worsening climate genocide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2011/11/25/us-media-censor-out-bbc-tv-frozen-planet-series-climate-change-episode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penn &amp; Teller claims organic food is &#8220;bullshit&#8221;, fails to mention that their expert is paid by Monsanto</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/08/05/penn-teller-claims-organic-food-is-bullshit-fails-to-mention-that-their-expert-is-paid-by-monsanto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/08/05/penn-teller-claims-organic-food-is-bullshit-fails-to-mention-that-their-expert-is-paid-by-monsanto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 02:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food & Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Avery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cato Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change deniers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate denialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debunked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ExxonMobil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Policy Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetically engineered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetically engineered food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hudson Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monsanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn & Teller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Penn Jillette and Teller, from the Penn &#38; Teller: Bullshit! TV show, calls in the latest episode organic food for “bullshit” (see video below). Penn and Teller’s main point why organic food is “bullshit” is simply because it “might mean &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/08/05/penn-teller-claims-organic-food-is-bullshit-fails-to-mention-that-their-expert-is-paid-by-monsanto/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.green-blog.org/media/images/uploads/2009/08/penn-and-teller-bullshit.jpg" alt="penn-and-teller-bullshit" title="penn-and-teller-bullshit" width="550" height="309" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1814" /></p>
<p>Penn Jillette and Teller, from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit!">Penn &amp; Teller: Bullshit!</a> TV show, calls in the latest episode organic food for “bullshit” (<s>see video below</s>). Penn and Teller’s main point why organic food is “bullshit” is simply because it “might mean you&#8217;re getting your food from giant corporations or China.”</p>
<p>But what Penn and Teller fail to mention is that the so called “Food Policy Analyst Expert”, Alex Avery, is paid by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_Institute">the Hudson Institute</a>. The Hudson Institute is an American conservative, religious and free market think tank. Simply put, they are corporate lobbyists. And the prestigious-sounding Hudson Institute is funded by giant corporations such as Monsanto, the leading producer of genetically engineered (GE) food.</p>
<p><span id="more-1785"></span></p>
<p>You also shouldn&#8217;t forget that Penn and Teller are <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Penn_and_Teller:_Bullshit!">members of the Cato Institute</a>, which is another libertarian corporate think tank funded by such fine corporations as ExxonMobil. The Cato Institute is known for <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/16/fedex-gm-microsoft-toyota-visa-and-walmart-funds-climate-denialism/">spreading and funding anti-scientific climate denialism</a> and misinformation.</p>
<p>But this is not the first time Penn and Teller’s “Bullshit!” show receives criticism, and especially not when they cover environmental topics. In season one, aired 2003, Penn and Teller claims that the global warming crisis was created by “hysterical hippies and environmentalists”. Their biased and misinformed global warming episode has since then been criticized and debunked. <a href="http://www.logicalscience.com/skeptics/bullsheit.html">Logical Science</a> has listed and debunked the claims Penn and Teller made in the episode:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In Episode 13, season 1 of Penn &amp; Teller: Bullshit! they try to prove the global warming crisis, among other things, was created by the out of control imagination of hysterical hippies and environmentalists. This is why the episode is titled &#8220;Environmental Hysteria&#8221;.  We would just like to point out that Penn Jillette is a <a href="http://www.cato.org/people/jillette.html">research fellow</a> of the <a href="http://www2.exxonmobil.com/files/corporate/public_policy1.pdf">ExxonMobil</a> and Industry funded CATO institute which has strong <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minarchist">minarchist</a> leanings. This gives Penn Jillete a conflict of interest when it comes to any topic that might require government regulation. During the show he puts Tobacco and Oil funded lobbyists against hippie college protesters.  If a fair match was their intent they should have those lawyers up against any of the scientists on this massive <a href="http://www.logicalscience.com/consensus/consensus.htm">list</a>. Granted the show was officially about &#8220;hysteria&#8221; and not science itself but that doesn&#8217;t excuse them for grossly misrepresenting a very strong <a href="http://www.logicalscience.com/consensus/consensus.htm">scientific consensus</a> and providing facts thats are demonstrably false.  The following is a quoted, sourced, and time stamped point by point analysis of their show. It will focus on the facts presented by Penn &amp; Teller&#8217;s &#8220;experts&#8221;"</p></blockquote>
<p>Another debunked claim by Penn and Teller is that recycling paper would pollute more than making new paper. This is <a href="http://www.de-fact-o.com/fact_read.php?id=62">a false claim</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Recycling also helps prevent pollution. For example, recycling paper instead of making it from new material generates 74 percent less air pollution and uses 50 percent less water.</p></blockquote>
<p>Simply put: Don&#8217;t trust a magician!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/08/05/penn-teller-claims-organic-food-is-bullshit-fails-to-mention-that-their-expert-is-paid-by-monsanto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research shows that PlayStation 3 uses 500% more energy than a refrigerator</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plasma TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony PlayStation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian Consumer Association recently published a list on Computer Energy Costs for various home gadgets such as your computer screen, DVD player, cordless telephone, gaming console, laptop etc. Interesting with this list is that it shows how much energy &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://green-blog.org/media/images/2008/06/playstation-3.jpg" alt="Sony PlayStation 3" title="Sony PlayStation 3" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-434" /></p>
<p>The Australian Consumer Association recently published a list on <a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=5&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">Computer Energy Costs</a> for various home gadgets such as your computer screen, DVD player, cordless telephone, gaming console, laptop etc.</p>
<p>Interesting with this list is that it shows how much energy these gadgets consume weekly, monthly as well as yearly, even when they are supposed to be off.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=4&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">According to the study</a>, the Sony PlayStation 3 consumes 33.34 kWh (weekly consumption) when on and playing a game. That is more than a Plasma TV who uses 29.68 kWh when on and playing a DVD.</p>
<p><span id="more-301"></span></p>
<p>When the same game console is off (back switch on) it still consumes 0.30 kWh. Microsoft&#8217;s Xbox 360 consumes 0.40 kWh when off and 26.00 kWh when on and playing. The Nintendo Wii is a bit better, it consumes 3.14 kWh when on and playing a game. But it consumes 0.32 kWh when off (WiiConnect24 is off). That is more than PlayStation 3.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our tests also found that leaving a PlayStation 3 on while not in use would cost almost $250 a year in electricity bills (charged at 15c per kWh). This alone is around five times more than it would take to run a refrigerator for the same yearly period.</p>
<p>The Xbox 360 was not far behind the PlayStation 3 in energy usage costs per year, serving as an important reminder to turn off videogame systems after use.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The only way to be sure these energy hungry gadgets don&#8217;t consume energy (and your money) is to make sure they are <a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=6&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">switched off and unplugged</a> when you are not using them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

