<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Green Blog &#187; poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-blog.org/tag/poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-blog.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:58:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Majority of Americans say we should do whatever it takes to protect the environment</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2011/06/08/majority-of-americans-say-we-should-do-whatever-it-takes-to-protect-the-environment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2011/06/08/majority-of-americans-say-we-should-do-whatever-it-takes-to-protect-the-environment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 22:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Resarch Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=2923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new survey titled &#8220;Beyond Red vs. Blue: The Political Typology&#8221; (pdf) from the Pew Resarch Center shows that public support for the environment and alternative energy sources is strong on both sides of the political scale in America. When &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2011/06/08/majority-of-americans-say-we-should-do-whatever-it-takes-to-protect-the-environment/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new survey titled &#8220;<a href="http://people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/Beyond-Red-vs-Blue-The-Political-Typology.pdf">Beyond Red vs. Blue: The Political Typology</a>&#8221; (pdf) from the <a href="http://people-press.org/2011/05/04/beyond-red-vs-blue-the-political-typology/">Pew Resarch Center</a> shows that public support for the environment and alternative energy sources is strong on both sides of the political scale in America.</p>
<p>When it comes to the question about energy priorities for America there is a strong consensus. A majority wants the US to invest in renewable energy sources such as wind, hydrogen and solar instead of expanding the oil, natural gas and coal sector. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Nearly two-thirds of Americans (63%) say developing alternative sources such as wind, solar and hydrogen technology should be the more important priority for addressing America’s energy supply; 29% say expanding exploration and production of oil, coal and natural gas should be the more important priority.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-2923"></span></p>
<p>Some findings that didn&#8217;t really surprise anyone was the result that right-wing libertarians and conservatives doesn&#8217;t like environmental regulations while being more supportive of corporations. While 39% of the general public agree with the statement that &#8220;stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy&#8221; as many as 79% of libertarians agree on that.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Staunch Conservatives and Libertarians are the only groups in which majorities say the U.S. has gone too far in its efforts to protect the environment. In all other groups – including Main Street Republicans and the GOP-leaning Disaffecteds – most say that this country should do whatever it takes to protect the environment.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The only ones who rather want to see more investments in the fossil fuel industry than the development of renewable energy sources are &#8220;staunch conservatives&#8221;. Libertarians also misses a majority agreement on this issue.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Staunch Conservatives are the only group in which a majority says expanding oil, coal and natural gas should be the priority; fully 72% say this should be the focus, while just 15% would emphasize alternative energy sources.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>When it comes to the question of global warming you can still, unfortunately, see that it &#8220;remains a deeply partisan issue&#8221;. A majority of the public says there is evidence that the global temperature is rising and that the climate is changing.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Overall, 58% of the public says there is solid evidence that the average temperature on earth has been getting warmer over the past few decades while 34% say there is no solid evidence of warming. Just over a third (36%) say this warming is mostly because of human activity such as burning fossil fuels, while 18% say it is mostly because of natural patterns in the earth’s environment.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>But what is more interesting, and satisfying to read, is that 71% of Americans believe the USA &#8220;should do whatever it takes to protect the environment&#8221;. And 59% believe strongly in that.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.green-blog.org/media/images/uploads/2011/06/2011-poll-global-warming.png"><img src="http://www.green-blog.org/media/images/uploads/2011/06/2011-poll-global-warming.png" alt="" title="2011-poll-global-warming" width="616" height="372" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2924" /></a></p>
 <p><a href="http://www.green-blog.org/?flattrss_redirect&amp;id=2923&amp;md5=a8c33c4d504cdcc5a8e072023b13887c" title="Flattr" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.green-blog.org/wp-content/plugins/flattr/img/flattr-badge-large.png" alt="flattr this!"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2011/06/08/majority-of-americans-say-we-should-do-whatever-it-takes-to-protect-the-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Foreign Secretary warns that the UN climate talks could fail</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/09/11/uk-foreign-secretary-warns-that-the-un-climate-talks-could-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/09/11/uk-foreign-secretary-warns-that-the-un-climate-talks-could-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate negotiations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cop15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Miliband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green blog poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN climate summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN COP15]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Foreign Secretary in the UK, David Miliband, doesn’t seem to have much hope on the upcoming UN Climate Change Conference (Cop15) this December in Copenhagen, Denmark. Miliband even warns that the climate talks are in &#8220;real danger&#8221; of failing, the &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/09/11/uk-foreign-secretary-warns-that-the-un-climate-talks-could-fail/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foreign Secretary in the UK, <a id="aptureLink_BHaimSPHkJ" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David%20Miliband">David Miliband</a>, doesn’t seem to have much hope on the upcoming UN Climate Change Conference (Cop15) this December in <a id="aptureLink_uUr8xWvvmL" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?om=0&amp;iwloc=addr&amp;f=q&amp;ll=55.6762944%2C12.5681157&amp;hl=en&amp;z=11&amp;ie=UTF8">Copenhagen</a>, Denmark. Miliband even warns that the climate talks are in &#8220;real danger&#8221; of failing, <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/real-danger-climate-change-deal-attempt-could-fail-1783653.html">the Independent reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The deal the world needs in Copenhagen is now in the balance,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s a real danger the talks scheduled for December will not reach a positive outcome, and an equal danger in the run-up to Copenhagen that people don&#8217;t wake up to the danger of failure until it&#8217;s too late.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Miliband put the blame on “the complexity of the issue”, the economic recession as well as &#8220;suspicion&#8221; between <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/01/19/uneven-development-and-northern-imperialism-in-the-making-of-todays-ecological-crisis/">the North and the South</a>. In light of a diplomatic pr tour around Europe “to raise the issue of climate change” Miliband warned that if the world failed to come up with an agreement to cut emissions global temperatures will increase with 4C.</p>
<blockquote><p>“This would lead to large scale migration as parts of the world disappeared under rising seas, threaten infrastructure as extreme weather events became more common, and put pressure on natural resources such as water &#8211; all of which could have serious impacts on peace and security across the world.”</p></blockquote>
<p>What do you think about the upcoming Climate Change Conference this December &#8211; the last chance we have to take action against “<a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/01/president-of-the-maldives-please-dont-be-stupid/">the greatest threat the world has ever faced</a>”? Will it be a success or a failure? What are your hopes and expectations? Please share your thoughts and ideas by voting in the poll below and/or making a comment.</p>
<p>[polldaddy poll=1981184]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/09/11/uk-foreign-secretary-warns-that-the-un-climate-talks-could-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evangelical Christians in USA help spread climate denial and confusion</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/18/evangelical-christians-in-usa-help-spread-climate-denial-and-confusion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/18/evangelical-christians-in-usa-help-spread-climate-denial-and-confusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change deniers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate deniers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming denialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming deniers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A survey released this week by the Pew Forum on Religion &#038; Public Life shows that only 47% of people in the USA believes there is evidence of man-made climate change. Although a majority &#8220;believes&#8221; in climate change, over 20% &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/18/evangelical-christians-in-usa-help-spread-climate-denial-and-confusion/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.green-blog.org/media/images/uploads/2009/04/us-religion-climate.gif" alt="us-religion-climate" title="us-religion-climate" width="550" height="470" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1392" /></p>
<p>A survey released this week by the <a href="http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=238">Pew Forum on Religion &#038; Public Life</a> shows that only 47% of people in the USA believes there is evidence of man-made climate change. Although a majority &#8220;believes&#8221; in climate change, over 20% doesn&#8217;t think there is any evidence of the earth warming. And among <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2009/apr/17/climate-change-religion">white evangelical Protestants in USA</a> only 34% believes the earth is warming due to human activity, while over 30% don’t believe in it at all.</p>
<p><span id="more-1391"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The poll canvassed views on climate change among the &#8220;major religious traditions&#8221; in the US. Surprise, surprise, it shows that &#8220;white evangelical Protestants&#8221; were the group with the lowest level – 34% of those surveyed – of acceptance that there is solid evidence that global warming is real and that it is attributable to humans. This compares with 47% of the total US population (still startlingly low), and 58% of those surveyed who &#8220;had faith&#8221; but who were unaffiliated to any particular religious tradition.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe those 31% evangelical Protestants believes <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/15/stupidity-in-action-congressman-says-god-decides-when-the-earth-will-end/">God decides when the earth will end</a>? But I guess it makes more sense for these people to believe in a fairy-tale God that in his name promotes slavery, rape and murder instead of common sense and modern-day science? </p>
<p>But sure. You must give credit where credit is due, I suppose. Some of these evangelical Christians have started highlighting environmental concerns and adopt a more environmentalistic approach. Something they call &#8220;creation care&#8221;. Although it has already <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/01/07/green-bible-sparks-controversy-in-usa/">sparked controversy among evangelicals</a>. </p>
<blockquote><p>Last year, there was even an attempt by some leaders to talk up the need for &#8220;creation care&#8221;, but to dampen concern for global warming. The &#8220;We Get It!&#8221; campaign&#8217;s declaration is something to behold:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;God created everything. He made us in His own image, and commanded us to be fruitful and multiply and watch over His creation. Although separated from God by our sin, we are lovingly restored through Jesus Christ, and take responsibility for being good stewards. Our stewardship of creation must be based on Biblical principles and factual evidence. We face important environmental challenges, but must be cautious of claims that our planet is in peril from speculative dangers like man-made global warming. With billions suffering in poverty, environmental policies must not further oppress the world&#8217;s poor by denying them basic needs. Instead, we must help people fulfill their God-given potential as producers and stewards. We will follow our Lord Jesus Christ and honor God as we use and share the principles of His Word to care for the poor and tend His creation.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>This would just be a silly side note if it weren’t for the fact that while the <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/03/17/media-copenhagen-global-warming-impacts-worst-case-ipcc/">media in the USA ignores the latest warnings from climate scientists</a> an <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/116590/Increased-Number-Think-Global-Warming-Exaggerated.aspx">increasing number of people in the US</a> believe global warming is exaggerated. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Although a majority of Americans believe the seriousness of global warming is either correctly portrayed in the news or underestimated, a record-high 41% now say it is exaggerated. This represents the highest level of public skepticism about mainstream reporting on global warming seen in more than a decade of Gallup polling on the subject.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>So unfortunately it seems that these climate and science denying religious fundamentalists is, mainly due to their effective propaganda machine, playing a large part in spreading <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/16/fedex-gm-microsoft-toyota-visa-and-walmart-funds-climate-denialism/">climate denialism</a> and confusion in USA. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/18/evangelical-christians-in-usa-help-spread-climate-denial-and-confusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you think the Bali Climate Conference will be a success?</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/01/07/do-you-think-the-bali-climate-conference-will-be-a-success/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/01/07/do-you-think-the-bali-climate-conference-will-be-a-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bali 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/01/07/do-you-think-the-bali-climate-conference-will-be-a-success/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our latest web poll here on Green Blog we asked if you thought the Bali Climate Conference would be a success. Here are the results: A majority of the people said yes. They thought that the climate conference would &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/01/07/do-you-think-the-bali-climate-conference-will-be-a-success/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our latest web poll here on Green Blog we asked if you thought the Bali Climate Conference would be a success. Here are the results:</p>
<p>A majority of the people said yes. They thought that the climate conference would be a success but that the result probably wouldn’t be enough.</p>
<p>Around 25% of you thought that the conference would be a failure. But on the same time you wished it would turn out to be a success.</p>
<p>13% hadn’t really any idea how the outcome would be. And just as many thought that world leaders would fail once again making the climate conference a total failure.</p>
<p>None of you thought that world leaders would come together and “do the right thing”.</p>
<p>Our new web poll question: <em>Is nuclear energy &#8220;green&#8221;?</em></p>
<p><strong>Cast your votes!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/01/07/do-you-think-the-bali-climate-conference-will-be-a-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

