<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Green Blog &#187; Nintendo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-blog.org/tag/nintendo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-blog.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:58:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Research shows that PlayStation 3 uses 500% more energy than a refrigerator</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plasma TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony PlayStation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian Consumer Association recently published a list on Computer Energy Costs for various home gadgets such as your computer screen, DVD player, cordless telephone, gaming console, laptop etc. Interesting with this list is that it shows how much energy &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://green-blog.org/media/images/2008/06/playstation-3.jpg" alt="Sony PlayStation 3" title="Sony PlayStation 3" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-434" /></p>
<p>The Australian Consumer Association recently published a list on <a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=5&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">Computer Energy Costs</a> for various home gadgets such as your computer screen, DVD player, cordless telephone, gaming console, laptop etc.</p>
<p>Interesting with this list is that it shows how much energy these gadgets consume weekly, monthly as well as yearly, even when they are supposed to be off.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=4&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">According to the study</a>, the Sony PlayStation 3 consumes 33.34 kWh (weekly consumption) when on and playing a game. That is more than a Plasma TV who uses 29.68 kWh when on and playing a DVD.</p>
<p><span id="more-301"></span></p>
<p>When the same game console is off (back switch on) it still consumes 0.30 kWh. Microsoft&#8217;s Xbox 360 consumes 0.40 kWh when off and 26.00 kWh when on and playing. The Nintendo Wii is a bit better, it consumes 3.14 kWh when on and playing a game. But it consumes 0.32 kWh when off (WiiConnect24 is off). That is more than PlayStation 3.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our tests also found that leaving a PlayStation 3 on while not in use would cost almost $250 a year in electricity bills (charged at 15c per kWh). This alone is around five times more than it would take to run a refrigerator for the same yearly period.</p>
<p>The Xbox 360 was not far behind the PlayStation 3 in energy usage costs per year, serving as an important reminder to turn off videogame systems after use.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The only way to be sure these energy hungry gadgets don&#8217;t consume energy (and your money) is to make sure they are <a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=6&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">switched off and unplugged</a> when you are not using them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple is now greener than Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/04/03/apple-is-now-greener-than-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/04/03/apple-is-now-greener-than-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenpeace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Greener Electronics Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic chemicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is now &#8220;greener&#8221; than its rival Microsoft according to the Greener Electronics Guide from Greenpeace. But both companies have still a long way to go until they can beat Samsung and Toshiba who currently leads the &#8220;green race&#8221;. Greenpeace &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/04/03/apple-is-now-greener-than-microsoft/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=7,0,0,0" width="430" height="237" id="Green v.06MX" align="middle"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/assets/binaries/rankingguide7thedition.swf" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#cccccc" /><embed src="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/assets/binaries/rankingguide7thedition.swf" quality="high" bgcolor="#cccccc" width="550" height="303" name="Green v.06MX" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" allowFullScreen="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" /></p>
<p>Apple is now &#8220;greener&#8221; than its rival Microsoft according to <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/guide-greener-electronics-march-170308">the Greener Electronics Guide</a> from Greenpeace. But both companies have still a long way to go until they can beat Samsung and Toshiba who currently leads the &#8220;green race&#8221;.</p>
<p>Greenpeace recently released its <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/of-greener-electronics-sa-7.pdf">seventh version</a> of their Greener Electronics Guide where it ranks electronic companies based on their actions against e-waste and harmful toxic chemicals.</p>
<p>Apple has gained 0.7 points since <a href="http://green-blog.org/2007/11/28/nokia-loses-its-top-spot-in-the-greener-electronics-guide/">the last update</a>. Apple have gained more points because of new models have been introduced, mainly the new <a href="http://green-blog.org/2008/02/01/the-new-macbook-air-from-apple/">MacBook Air</a>, that contains less toxic chemicals. But Greenpeace emphasizes their &#8220;takeback programme still needs to be global&#8221;.</p>
<p><span id="more-241"></span></p>
<p>While Sony Ericsson <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up">drops 6 places</a>, &#8220;due to losing points on its e-waste policy and practice,&#8221; Toshiba and Samsung grab the top spots.</p>
<p>Samsung with their 7.7 &#8220;scores points well on toxic chemicals policy. Loses points for incomplete takeback practice.&#8221; Toshiba who also have 7.7 points continues to improve, &#8220;especially on e-waste and recycling policy.&#8221;</p>
<p>The biggest disappointment is that Nintendo still &#8220;remains rooted to the bottom with only a tiny improvement.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can help make Nintendo score better in the next update by <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/clashoftheconsoles/write-to-nintendo">sending Mr Satoru Iwata a letter</a>.</p>
<p>Related: <a href="http://green-blog.org/2007/11/28/nokia-loses-its-top-spot-in-the-greener-electronics-guide/">Nokia loses its top spot in the Greener Electronics Guide from Greenpeace</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/04/03/apple-is-now-greener-than-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

