<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Green Blog &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-blog.org/tag/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-blog.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:58:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FedEx, GM, Microsoft, Toyota, Visa, and WalMart funds climate denialism</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/16/fedex-gm-microsoft-toyota-visa-and-walmart-funds-climate-denialism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/16/fedex-gm-microsoft-toyota-visa-and-walmart-funds-climate-denialism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cato Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change deniers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate deniers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FedEx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming denialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TimeWarner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volkswagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WalMart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Climate Progress well-known companies such as Comcast, FedEx, GM, Honda, Microsoft, TimeWarner, Toyota, Visa, VW, and WalMart is helping to fuel global warming denialism by funding the Cato Institute. &#8220;Comcast, FedEx, GM, Honda, Microsoft, TimeWarner, Toyota (!), Visa, &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/16/fedex-gm-microsoft-toyota-visa-and-walmart-funds-climate-denialism/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.green-blog.org/media/images/uploads/2009/04/climate-denialism-ad.gif" alt="climate-denialism-ad" title="climate-denialism-ad" width="550" height="215" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1383" /></p>
<p>According to <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/03/31/fedex-gm-microsoft-toyota-visa-and-walmart-support-cato-which-is-buying-expensive-global-warming-denier-ads-attacking-obama/">Climate Progress</a> well-known companies such as Comcast, FedEx, GM, Honda, Microsoft, TimeWarner, Toyota, Visa, VW, and WalMart is helping to fuel global warming denialism by funding the <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/03/27/george-monbiots-royal-flush-of-climate-deniers/">Cato Institute</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Comcast, FedEx, GM, Honda, Microsoft, TimeWarner, Toyota (!), Visa, VW, and WalMart &#8212; these are among the brand name companies who support the global warming denial promoted by the Cato Institute (full list below).</p>
<p>Many of you have probably now seen that absurd anti-scientific denier <a href="http://www.cato.org/special/climatechange/cato_climate.pdf">ad</a> Cato is spending big bucks to put in major newspapers.  &#8220;The New York Times ad alone would have cost over $150,000, based on the newspaper&#8217;s published ad rates,&#8221; <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/03/30/tech-090330-cato-climate-change.html">notes</a> one article.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-1381"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>The ad attacks President Obama and the whole notion of strong climate action with studies that don&#8217;t even support its basic premise &#8212; see <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/03/25/cato-institute-global-warming-denial-ad-patrick-michaels-swanson/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: New study quoted by Cato Institute deniers concludes ">New study quoted by Cato deniers concludes &#8220;warming over the 21st century may well be larger than that predicted by the current generation of models&#8221;</a> and RealClimate&#8217;s excellent post (<a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/03/with-all-due-respect/">here</a>).&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>According to Cato’s most recent annual report (2007) these companies are sponsoring the &#8220;extreme&#8221; Cato Institute:</p>
<ul>
<li>Altria Corporate Services Inc.</li>
<li>American Petroleum Institute.</li>
<li>Amerisure Companies.</li>
<li>Comcast Corp.</li>
<li>Consumer Electronics Association.</li>
<li>FedEx Corp.</li>
<li>Freedom Communications Inc.</li>
<li>General Motors Corp.</li>
<li>Honda North America Inc.</li>
<li>Mazda North America Operations.</li>
<li>Microsoft Corporation.</li>
<li>R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company.</li>
<li>TimeWarner Inc.</li>
<li>Toyota Motor Corp.</li>
<li>UST Inc.</li>
<li>Visa USA Inc.</li>
<li>Volkswagen of America Inc.</li>
<li>Wal-Mart Stores Inc.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Shame on them!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/16/fedex-gm-microsoft-toyota-visa-and-walmart-funds-climate-denialism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research shows that PlayStation 3 uses 500% more energy than a refrigerator</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plasma TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony PlayStation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian Consumer Association recently published a list on Computer Energy Costs for various home gadgets such as your computer screen, DVD player, cordless telephone, gaming console, laptop etc. Interesting with this list is that it shows how much energy &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://green-blog.org/media/images/2008/06/playstation-3.jpg" alt="Sony PlayStation 3" title="Sony PlayStation 3" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-434" /></p>
<p>The Australian Consumer Association recently published a list on <a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=5&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">Computer Energy Costs</a> for various home gadgets such as your computer screen, DVD player, cordless telephone, gaming console, laptop etc.</p>
<p>Interesting with this list is that it shows how much energy these gadgets consume weekly, monthly as well as yearly, even when they are supposed to be off.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=4&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">According to the study</a>, the Sony PlayStation 3 consumes 33.34 kWh (weekly consumption) when on and playing a game. That is more than a Plasma TV who uses 29.68 kWh when on and playing a DVD.</p>
<p><span id="more-301"></span></p>
<p>When the same game console is off (back switch on) it still consumes 0.30 kWh. Microsoft&#8217;s Xbox 360 consumes 0.40 kWh when off and 26.00 kWh when on and playing. The Nintendo Wii is a bit better, it consumes 3.14 kWh when on and playing a game. But it consumes 0.32 kWh when off (WiiConnect24 is off). That is more than PlayStation 3.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our tests also found that leaving a PlayStation 3 on while not in use would cost almost $250 a year in electricity bills (charged at 15c per kWh). This alone is around five times more than it would take to run a refrigerator for the same yearly period.</p>
<p>The Xbox 360 was not far behind the PlayStation 3 in energy usage costs per year, serving as an important reminder to turn off videogame systems after use.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The only way to be sure these energy hungry gadgets don&#8217;t consume energy (and your money) is to make sure they are <a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=6&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">switched off and unplugged</a> when you are not using them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple is now greener than Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/04/03/apple-is-now-greener-than-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/04/03/apple-is-now-greener-than-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenpeace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Greener Electronics Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic chemicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is now &#8220;greener&#8221; than its rival Microsoft according to the Greener Electronics Guide from Greenpeace. But both companies have still a long way to go until they can beat Samsung and Toshiba who currently leads the &#8220;green race&#8221;. Greenpeace &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/04/03/apple-is-now-greener-than-microsoft/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=7,0,0,0" width="430" height="237" id="Green v.06MX" align="middle"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="false" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/assets/binaries/rankingguide7thedition.swf" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#cccccc" /><embed src="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/assets/binaries/rankingguide7thedition.swf" quality="high" bgcolor="#cccccc" width="550" height="303" name="Green v.06MX" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" allowFullScreen="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" /></p>
<p>Apple is now &#8220;greener&#8221; than its rival Microsoft according to <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/guide-greener-electronics-march-170308">the Greener Electronics Guide</a> from Greenpeace. But both companies have still a long way to go until they can beat Samsung and Toshiba who currently leads the &#8220;green race&#8221;.</p>
<p>Greenpeace recently released its <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/of-greener-electronics-sa-7.pdf">seventh version</a> of their Greener Electronics Guide where it ranks electronic companies based on their actions against e-waste and harmful toxic chemicals.</p>
<p>Apple has gained 0.7 points since <a href="http://green-blog.org/2007/11/28/nokia-loses-its-top-spot-in-the-greener-electronics-guide/">the last update</a>. Apple have gained more points because of new models have been introduced, mainly the new <a href="http://green-blog.org/2008/02/01/the-new-macbook-air-from-apple/">MacBook Air</a>, that contains less toxic chemicals. But Greenpeace emphasizes their &#8220;takeback programme still needs to be global&#8221;.</p>
<p><span id="more-241"></span></p>
<p>While Sony Ericsson <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up">drops 6 places</a>, &#8220;due to losing points on its e-waste policy and practice,&#8221; Toshiba and Samsung grab the top spots.</p>
<p>Samsung with their 7.7 &#8220;scores points well on toxic chemicals policy. Loses points for incomplete takeback practice.&#8221; Toshiba who also have 7.7 points continues to improve, &#8220;especially on e-waste and recycling policy.&#8221;</p>
<p>The biggest disappointment is that Nintendo still &#8220;remains rooted to the bottom with only a tiny improvement.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can help make Nintendo score better in the next update by <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/clashoftheconsoles/write-to-nintendo">sending Mr Satoru Iwata a letter</a>.</p>
<p>Related: <a href="http://green-blog.org/2007/11/28/nokia-loses-its-top-spot-in-the-greener-electronics-guide/">Nokia loses its top spot in the Greener Electronics Guide from Greenpeace</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/04/03/apple-is-now-greener-than-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change your Windows XP Power Profile to save energy</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/02/change-your-windows-xp-power-profile-to-save-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/02/change-your-windows-xp-power-profile-to-save-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD A64]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD Athlon XP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy saving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel Pentium 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/03/02/change-your-windows-xp-power-profile-to-save-energy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday we got this email from Matt Bentley: Changing Microsoft XP power scheme settings determines whether or not power-saving CPU features are activated in a machine when idle. All modern desktop CPU&#8217;s past the AMD Athlon XP and the Intel &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/02/change-your-windows-xp-power-profile-to-save-energy/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday we got this email from <a href="http://mattbentley.muzic.net.nz/2008pt1.shtml#020308">Matt Bentley</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Changing Microsoft XP power scheme settings determines whether or not power-saving CPU features are activated in a machine when idle.</p>
<p>All modern desktop CPU&#8217;s past the AMD Athlon XP and the Intel Pentium 4 (ie. AMD A64 &#038; Intel Core and upwards) have some kind of speed-stepping feature built into them, which is utilised via Windows XP&#8217;s power management settings as per Orthogonal Thought&#8217;s blog.</p>
<p>What does this mean? Well, basically, if we all switch our desktop computer&#8217;s power scheme to &#8216;Laptop/Portable&#8217;, our computers will drop the cpu voltage and frequency when idle (provided the motherboard supports it, and most do), saving 30w (on average) &#8211; it&#8217;s like switching to an energy-saver lightbulb, essentially – and has absolutely no performance impact when not running idle.</p></blockquote>
<p>Learn more: <a href="http://www.orthogonalthought.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/intel-speedstep-windows-xp-and-confusing-power-profiles/">Intel SpeedStep, Windows XP, and confusing Power Profiles</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/02/change-your-windows-xp-power-profile-to-save-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

