<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Green Blog &#187; energy usage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-blog.org/tag/energy-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-blog.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:58:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Research shows that PlayStation 3 uses 500% more energy than a refrigerator</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plasma TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony PlayStation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian Consumer Association recently published a list on Computer Energy Costs for various home gadgets such as your computer screen, DVD player, cordless telephone, gaming console, laptop etc. Interesting with this list is that it shows how much energy &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://green-blog.org/media/images/2008/06/playstation-3.jpg" alt="Sony PlayStation 3" title="Sony PlayStation 3" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-434" /></p>
<p>The Australian Consumer Association recently published a list on <a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=5&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">Computer Energy Costs</a> for various home gadgets such as your computer screen, DVD player, cordless telephone, gaming console, laptop etc.</p>
<p>Interesting with this list is that it shows how much energy these gadgets consume weekly, monthly as well as yearly, even when they are supposed to be off.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=4&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">According to the study</a>, the Sony PlayStation 3 consumes 33.34 kWh (weekly consumption) when on and playing a game. That is more than a Plasma TV who uses 29.68 kWh when on and playing a DVD.</p>
<p><span id="more-301"></span></p>
<p>When the same game console is off (back switch on) it still consumes 0.30 kWh. Microsoft&#8217;s Xbox 360 consumes 0.40 kWh when off and 26.00 kWh when on and playing. The Nintendo Wii is a bit better, it consumes 3.14 kWh when on and playing a game. But it consumes 0.32 kWh when off (WiiConnect24 is off). That is more than PlayStation 3.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our tests also found that leaving a PlayStation 3 on while not in use would cost almost $250 a year in electricity bills (charged at 15c per kWh). This alone is around five times more than it would take to run a refrigerator for the same yearly period.</p>
<p>The Xbox 360 was not far behind the PlayStation 3 in energy usage costs per year, serving as an important reminder to turn off videogame systems after use.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The only way to be sure these energy hungry gadgets don&#8217;t consume energy (and your money) is to make sure they are <a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=6&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">switched off and unplugged</a> when you are not using them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How green is your computer?</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/04/03/how-green-is-your-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/04/03/how-green-is-your-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sierra Club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consider this statement: &#8220;The EPA&#8217;s Energy Star efficiency criteria only consider the energy a PC uses while it&#8217;s in standby mode, which means that almost all current PCs qualify as Energy Star compliant.&#8221; Is that statement true or false? What &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/04/03/how-green-is-your-computer/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/eurleif/255241547/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/99/255241547_80eb1c2ea0_m.jpg" align="right" alt="How green is your computer?" /></a>Consider this statement: &#8220;The EPA&#8217;s Energy Star efficiency criteria only consider the energy a PC uses while it&#8217;s in standby mode, which means that almost all current PCs qualify as Energy Star compliant.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that statement true or false?</p>
<p>What about this: &#8220;Constantly shutting down and restarting your computer during the day would consume more energy than just leaving it running.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that true or false?</p>
<p>If you are a bit unsure you might want to check out the Sierra Club&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.sierraclub.org/howgreen/PC/">How Green is My PC</a>&#8221; quiz. The quiz will ask and tell you about ten different questions related to your computers energy usage, environmental impacts etc.</p>
<p><em>Thanks to Tedd Riggs for the link.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/04/03/how-green-is-your-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

