<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Green Blog &#187; energy consumption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-blog.org/tag/energy-consumption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-blog.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:58:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Renewable energy could power 40% of global electricity demand by 2050</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/03/24/renewable-energy-could-power-40-of-global-electricity-demand-by-2050/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/03/24/renewable-energy-could-power-40-of-global-electricity-demand-by-2050/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2030]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2050]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Lund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photovoltaic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo credit: Blyzz New research from the Helsinki University of Technology&#8217;s Advanced Energy Systems in Espoo, Finland, shows that with the help from global cooperation and investment renewable energy will “exceed all previous estimates.” According to the new findings renewable &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/03/24/renewable-energy-could-power-40-of-global-electricity-demand-by-2050/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="flickr"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/29335908@N00/2073765121/" title="Wind Turbine" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2113/2073765121_68935d12a0_m.jpg" alt="Wind Turbine" border="0" /></a><br /><small><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/" title="Attribution-NoDerivs License" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.green-blog.org/wp-content/plugins/photo-dropper/images/cc.png" alt="Creative Commons License" border="0" width="16" height="16" align="absmiddle" /></a> Photo credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/29335908@N00/2073765121/" title="Blyzz" target="_blank">Blyzz</a></small></div>
<p>New research from the Helsinki University of Technology&#8217;s Advanced Energy Systems in Espoo, Finland, shows that with the help from global cooperation and investment renewable energy will “exceed all previous estimates.”</p>
<p>According to the new findings renewable energy technologies like <a href="http://climatecongress.ku.dk/newsroom/renewable_energy/">wind and photovoltaics could supply 40% of the world&#8217;s electricity by 2050</a>. But this could only become a reality if the renewable technology is backed up by adequate financial and political support.  If not, the renewable share is likely to hover somewhere below 15 percent.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our findings demonstrate that with global political support and financial investment, previous notions that the potential for renewables was in some way limited to a negligible fraction of world demand were wrong,&#8221; Peter Lund from the Helsinki University of Technology&#8217;s Advanced Energy Systems said. &#8220;If we prioritize and recognize the value of renewable energy technologies, their potential to supply us with the energy we need is tremendous.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Previous projections have put the renewable share at only 12% by 2030.</p>
<p><strong>Also read:</strong> <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/10/16/10-of-us-energy-now-comes-from-renewable-energy-sources/">10% of U.S. Energy Now Comes From Renewable Energy Sources</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/03/24/renewable-energy-could-power-40-of-global-electricity-demand-by-2050/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research shows that PlayStation 3 uses 500% more energy than a refrigerator</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plasma TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony PlayStation 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian Consumer Association recently published a list on Computer Energy Costs for various home gadgets such as your computer screen, DVD player, cordless telephone, gaming console, laptop etc. Interesting with this list is that it shows how much energy &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://green-blog.org/media/images/2008/06/playstation-3.jpg" alt="Sony PlayStation 3" title="Sony PlayStation 3" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-434" /></p>
<p>The Australian Consumer Association recently published a list on <a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=5&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">Computer Energy Costs</a> for various home gadgets such as your computer screen, DVD player, cordless telephone, gaming console, laptop etc.</p>
<p>Interesting with this list is that it shows how much energy these gadgets consume weekly, monthly as well as yearly, even when they are supposed to be off.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=4&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">According to the study</a>, the Sony PlayStation 3 consumes 33.34 kWh (weekly consumption) when on and playing a game. That is more than a Plasma TV who uses 29.68 kWh when on and playing a DVD.</p>
<p><span id="more-301"></span></p>
<p>When the same game console is off (back switch on) it still consumes 0.30 kWh. Microsoft&#8217;s Xbox 360 consumes 0.40 kWh when off and 26.00 kWh when on and playing. The Nintendo Wii is a bit better, it consumes 3.14 kWh when on and playing a game. But it consumes 0.32 kWh when off (WiiConnect24 is off). That is more than PlayStation 3.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our tests also found that leaving a PlayStation 3 on while not in use would cost almost $250 a year in electricity bills (charged at 15c per kWh). This alone is around five times more than it would take to run a refrigerator for the same yearly period.</p>
<p>The Xbox 360 was not far behind the PlayStation 3 in energy usage costs per year, serving as an important reminder to turn off videogame systems after use.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The only way to be sure these energy hungry gadgets don&#8217;t consume energy (and your money) is to make sure they are <a href="http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=106346&#038;catId=100245&#038;tid=100008&#038;p=6&#038;title=Computers'+energy+costs">switched off and unplugged</a> when you are not using them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/06/16/research-shows-that-playstation-3-uses-500-more-energy-than-a-refrigerator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

