<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Green Blog &#187; corn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-blog.org/tag/corn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-blog.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:58:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Saying &#8220;No!&#8221; to GMO in North America</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2010/09/11/saying-no-to-gmo-in-north-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2010/09/11/saying-no-to-gmo-in-north-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leah Karpus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food & Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certified organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers. non-GMO project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frankenfood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetically modified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetically Modified Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmo free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenpeace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monsanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature's Path]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific studies. labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terminator seeds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=2448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo credit: {Guerrilla Futures &#124; Jason Tester} What are genetically modified foods? Biotechnology covers a broad range of technological “advancements” in food. These include the production of herbicides and pesticides, the use of antibiotics in dairy and meat, and of &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2010/09/11/saying-no-to-gmo-in-north-america/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h6 class="flickr"><a title="IMG_1011.JPG" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/89306448@N00/316006453/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/121/316006453_c89c17ced7_m.jpg" border="0" alt="IMG_1011.JPG" /></a><br />
<a title="Attribution-NoDerivs License" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.green-blog.org/wp-content/plugins/photo-dropper/images/cc.png" border="0" alt="Creative Commons License" width="16" height="16" align="absMiddle" /></a> Photo credit: <a title="{Guerrilla Futures | Jason Tester}" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/89306448@N00/316006453/" target="_blank">{Guerrilla Futures | Jason Tester}</a></h6>
<p><strong>What are genetically modified foods?</strong></p>
<p>Biotechnology covers a broad range of technological “advancements” in food. These include the production of herbicides and pesticides, the use of antibiotics in dairy and meat, and of course, genetically modified foods (Otero, 2008). Genetically modified food refers to food that has had its genetic structure altered in some way, such as by mixing genes of different organisms. Generally, this has been done to make a crop more efficient to produce, export and sell (Bakshi, 2003). Examples include making crops resistant to certain herbicides or pesticides, making food tougher and firmer to last during international shipping, and making crops that grow faster (Bakshi, 2003).</p>
<p><strong>What’s wrong with GMOs? </strong></p>
<p>Genetically modified food is shown to be very harmful. Increased serious food allergies (such as for soybeans and corn), heavy metal contamination, and antibiotic resistance are several examples of adverse health effects. Dr. Arpad Pusztai’s famous study determined that GM foods were toxic to mammals (see my article on the Dangers of Genetically Modified Foods). Mice that were fed a diet of GM foods became very ill (Bakshi, 2003). Interestingly, Pusztai’s research lost its funding from the British government (Bakshi, 2003). As well, GM foods are speculated to have less nutritional value than conventional, natural crops of the same kind (Bakshi, 2003). Lastly, most research that determined GM foods to be safe has been focused on one particular chemical at a time. That is, the combination of different chemicals (as they would appear in food) has mostly gone unexamined (Bakshi, 2003).</p>
<p><span id="more-2448"></span>These are the health effects of biotechnology, although they have many more problems, including the loss of biodiversity, and patents on plants and animals. As Greenpeace states, “Life is not a commodity” (<a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/canada/en/campaigns/ge/">http://www.greenpeace.org/canada/en/campaigns/ge/</a>). Additionally, the infamous terminator seeds are plants that are bioengineered to produce sterile seeds. This means that farmers cannot use the seeds to plant future crops in the upcoming years; new seeds must be purchased every year, leaving farmers dependent on biotechnology giants like Monsanto. Today, biotechnology corporations are some of the most powerful corporations in the world.</p>
<p><strong>How to avoid GM foods:</strong></p>
<p>The problem (as most of us know already) is that in North America, GMO foods are not labeled as genetically modified, as they are in Europe and other parts of the world. How, then, do we say “no” to GMO?</p>
<p><strong>Look for Non-GMO Product Certifications</strong></p>
<p>Since North American governments have failed to assure consumers about the safety of their food by labeling genetically modified products, individuals and organizations have taken it upon themselves to do this.</p>
<p>The North American non-profit organization Non-GMO Project (<a href="http://www.nongmoproject.org/">http://www.nongmoproject.org/</a>) has made a commitment to identify and locate products and companies that do not use any genetically modified ingredients. These include Nature’s Path Foods, Barbara’s Bakery, Choice Teas and Tofurky (meat alternatives). However, as mentioned, not all non-organic food is genetically modified. Non-organic companies that are still non-genetically modified include Kettle Chips, Silk (soy beverages), and Bragg’s soy sauce.</p>
<p>The organization is relatively new, so the Non-GMO Project assures us that the certification will be available sometime this Fall. Better yet, the Project has named October as GMO-free month! In the meantime, check out their website and sign the consumer pledge (<a href="http://www.nongmoproject.org/consumers/consumer-pledge/">http://www.nongmoproject.org/consumers/consumer-pledge/</a>) showing that you support their work and will purchase non-GMO products.</p>
<p><strong>Look for Certified Organic</strong></p>
<p>Generally, a good indicator of a GMO-free product is an organic certification. All products that are certified organic (meaning that it obeys the guidelines of a third party certifying body) must be non-genetically modified. Even this, however, can be difficult with multi-ingredient products. Tracking the sourcing of every ingredient can be tricky.</p>
<p><strong>Look for common GM ingredients</strong></p>
<p>When you’re in doubt, the most common genetically modified ingredients include corn, soy and canola. However, the situation becomes more difficult when these ingredients are hidden in other ingredients. Genetically modified corn, for instance, can be found in corn starch, high fructose corn syrup, and even maltodextrin. Because of these complexities, “it is estimated that GMOs are now present in more than 80% of packaged products in the average U.S. or Canadian grocery store” (source: <a href="http://www.nongmoproject.org/consumers/about-gmos/">http://www.nongmoproject.org/consumers/about-gmos/</a>).</p>
<p><strong>Take action</strong></p>
<p>Greenpeace’s website contains some excellent resources for consumers to take action against genetically modified food. Locate it here: <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/canada/en/campaigns/ge/Get-involved/">http://www.greenpeace.org/canada/en/campaigns/ge/Get-involved/</a> and send letters to political representatives explaining your concerns and urging them to take action.</p>
<p><strong>Contact the Company</strong></p>
<p>A possible way to find out if your favourite food contains genetically modified ingredients is by contacting the company directly. The only problem with this is that the one who answers the emails may not be the one who sees the food production firsthand.</p>
<p>From my own experience, I have received several responses that explain that it is difficult to track the production of the product, and therefore they don’t know for sure if biotechnology has been used. Is this an excuse to cover up known genetically modified ingredients? Is it a real example of how, when a company gets so large and decentralized, they no longer have full knowledge of the production process? Either way, it’s not ideal for the consumer.   </p>
<p>Your best bet? Buy certified organic, buy products labeled as non-genetically modified, support genetically-modified labeling initiatives by donating, and contact your political representatives to send them a message.</p>
 <p><a href="http://www.green-blog.org/?flattrss_redirect&amp;id=2448&amp;md5=ee05552ae2a41ecdc651ed7f2431ba75" title="Flattr" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.green-blog.org/wp-content/plugins/flattr/img/flattr-badge-large.png" alt="flattr this!"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2010/09/11/saying-no-to-gmo-in-north-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Corn&#8221; Plastic: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/06/30/corn-plastic-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/06/30/corn-plastic-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leah Karpus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food & Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodegradable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compostable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grocery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic bags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polylactic acid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo credit: Darwin Bell “Would you like a bag with that?”, asks the girl at the grocery store check-out. You glance at the couple of items purchased, and think of the walk home. She sees you hesitating and adds “It’s &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/06/30/corn-plastic-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="flickr"><a title="corntastic" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/53611153@N00/298911877/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/101/298911877_9344cadd4f_m.jpg" border="0" alt="corntastic" /></a><br />
<small><a title="Attribution License" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.green-blog.org/wp-content/plugins/photo-dropper/images/cc.png" border="0" alt="Creative Commons License" width="16" height="16" align="absmiddle" /></a> Photo credit: <a title="Darwin Bell" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/53611153@N00/298911877/" target="_blank">Darwin Bell</a></small></div>
<p>“Would you like a bag with that?”, asks the girl at the grocery store check-out. You glance at the couple of items purchased, and think of the walk home. She sees you hesitating and adds “It’s okay; these plastic bags are biodegradable. In fact, they’re made of corn!”</p>
<p>“Perfect!”, you think. Or is it?</p>
<p><strong>The Good</strong></p>
<p>This specific type of plastic is called PLA, or Polylactic acid. Simply put, PLA is created by fermenting the starch of corn kernels. Plastic made from PLA look and feel exactly like regular plastic, and PLA plastic bags are just as durable and lightweight as their non-PLA counterparts.</p>
<p>A renewable resource, PLA or “corn plastic” is 100% compostable. Under the right conditions, PLA breaks down in about one to six months in a commercial composter.</p>
<p><strong>The Bad</strong></p>
<p>But wait&#8230; what about in a landfill? As we all know, unless recycled, plastic bags that are used for groceries end up in city landfills, not commercial composters. In order to biodegrade, the PLA must receive sufficient amounts of oxygen, water, light and soil, which are not usually present in a landfill. Thus, it can take corn plastic just as long as regular plastic to break down—up to one thousand years. Unfortunately, that means that using corn plastic bags to line trash cans is no better than using regular plastic.</p>
<p><span id="more-1642"></span></p>
<p><strong>The Ugly</strong></p>
<p>Although corn may be a renewable resource, there is only a certain amount of corn in the world to be used at a certain time. The use of corn for anything other than food seems a little selfish when we consider how much of the world’s population go hungry every day. For example, the use of corn for ethanol has increased the price, and the demand, of this important crop. Furthermore, corn crops require an enormous amount of pesticides and chemical fertilizers compared to other US-grown crops.</p>
<p>One other not-to-be-overlooked fact about corn plastic: regardless of what some companies claim, PLA can cause severe reactions to people who have corn allergies. Accordingly PLA plastic should be clearly marked as derived from corn.</p>
<p><strong>The Verdict?</strong></p>
<p>PLA plastic may be a step in the right direction when it comes to sustainability, it’s one piece of a much wider issue. As in most cases, all parts of the story need to be closely examined. Perhaps with further research, a better alternative can be found. For now, however, if corn plastic seems too good to be true, it probably is. Next time, take a reusable cloth bag to the supermarket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/06/30/corn-plastic-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

