<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Green Blog &#187; Jesse Herman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-blog.org/author/jesse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-blog.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:58:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How are the  Candidates Going to Clean America?</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/09/16/how-are-the-candidates-going-to-clean-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/09/16/how-are-the-candidates-going-to-clean-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Herman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of  2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA election 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The method in which America creates energy has been a hot topic during the 2008 presidential election. For most, a primary concern deals with how we can keep prices down at the pump while eliminating our need for foreign oil. &#8230; <a href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/09/16/how-are-the-candidates-going-to-clean-america/"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The method in which America creates energy has been a hot  topic during the 2008 presidential election. For most, a primary concern deals  with how we can keep prices down at the pump while eliminating our need for  foreign oil. This desire has lead to the “drill here, drill now” crowd calling  for domestic offshore drilling (among other things). While everyone agrees that  energy independent principles are vital to revving up the American economy,  there are big differences in how to accomplish this task. Notably, when it  comes to the energy resources and environmental protection standards, there are  fundamental differences in Barack Obama’s and John McCain’s interests.  Additionally, when it comes to bills in congress addressing consumer  protection, manufacturing standards, and other topics not talked about enough, the future will heavily depend upon which candidate prevails. The following  include a few you may not have known about, and some you may have, but they are  all liable to affect the lives of everyday Americans.</p>
<p><span id="more-454"></span></p>
<p>One fact to note when looking for the candidates policies on  their respective websites is that <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/">Barack  Obama</a> has a category named “Energy and Environment” under the “Issues”  section. On the other hand, <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/">John McCain</a> has  “American Energy” and “Climate Change” listed as separate categories under the  “Issues” section. This seemingly subtle difference represents some conflicting  policies between the two candidates. While McCain believes in global warming,  he is resistant to associate the call for more oil with his global warming  concerns because supporting the two issues is a sheer contradiction. In sum,  Obama wants to rid our dependence on all oil (not just foreign) and McCain  wants to use every available resource needed to end our dependence on foreign oil.</p>
<p>McCain calls his energy plan “<a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/informing/Issues/17671aa4-2fe8-4008-859f-0ef1468e96f4.htm">The  Lexington Project</a>,” which is an <em>all  of the above energy solution </em>according to his website. Included is  expansion of domestic oil and natural oil exploration, tax credits for  automakers and consumers who buy cars with low carbon emissions, $2 billion  annually reserved for clean coal technology, 45 new nuclear power plants and he  will “encourage”  the market for  alternative fuels such as wind, hydro, and solar power. He has greenhouse gas  emissions targets listed in the climate change section that includes dropping  it 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and 66 percent below 2005 levels by  2050.</p>
<p>Obama calls his plan “<a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/newenergy">comprehensive</a>” and  puts added emphasis on new forms of energy. He wants to provide $1,000 to  American families through a windfall profits tax, calling it an “Emergency  Energy Rebate.”  He will invest $150  billion over the next 10 years to build a clean energy future, and in that same  allotted time, rid American dependency of foreign oil. He wants to put one  million plug-in hybrid cars on the road by 2015 and ensure 10 percent of our  electricity comes from renewable sources by 2012 and 25 percent by 2025. In  addition, Obama wants to implement an economy–wide cap-and-trade program to  reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050.</p>
<p>Interestingly, by 2050 many of those reading this article still  won’t be as old as John McCain is now. Moving on, there are other issues that  you may not hear about quite as much.</p>
<p>The use of asbestos in products and the manufacturing  industry could come to a close in 2009. Senator <a href="http://murray.senate.gov/">Patty Murray</a> introduced the “Ban Asbestos  in America Act” that has been introduced and passed by the entire U.S. Senate.  However, the bill does contain a harmful pro-industry amendment eliminating  coverage for workers exposed to products containing one percent or less of  asbestos. CWA and the AFL-CIO will work to have this language omitted in the  final Senate-House legislation.</p>
<p>Congresswoman <a href="http://www.mccollum.house.gov/">Betty  McCollum</a> has introduced the “Bruce Vento Asbestos and Prevent <a href="http://www.asbestos.com/">Mesothelioma</a> Act of 2008.” This legislation  is not expected to be passed by the full house during 2008, so this is  basically groundwork in order to get the bill passed in 2009. Right now there  are now <a href="http://www.asbestos.com/treatment/">mesothelioma treatments</a> that result in a cure.</p>
<p>Another bill is the “Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of  2008.” These are all supported by the  Blue-Green Labor/Environmental Coalition. </p>
<p>With Barack Obama as president and a Congress dominated by democrats, the above legislation should all pass. With John McCain as president, the bills could be vetoed. </p>
<p>In paying for all of these plans, Barack Obama pledges to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans (annual income of $250,000) and raise taxes on oil companies. While John McCain will actually lower taxes for oil companies, he pledges to cut small business taxes and promote fiscal  responsibility within the government. He says that with bi-partisan efforts, he  can bring the budget to balance by 2013. Until then, expect a dirty fight in  efforts toward a cleaner America.</p>
<p><em>Jesse Herman is the National Awareness Coordinator of the Mesothelioma Cancer Center.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/09/16/how-are-the-candidates-going-to-clean-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

