bg
  • Buzz this!
  • Dela
Published: September 11th, 2009

Foreign Secretary in the UK, David Miliband, doesn’t seem to have much hope on the upcoming UN Climate Change Conference (Cop15) this December in Copenhagen, Denmark. Miliband even warns that the climate talks are in “real danger” of failing, the Independent reports:

“The deal the world needs in Copenhagen is now in the balance,” he said.

“There’s a real danger the talks scheduled for December will not reach a positive outcome, and an equal danger in the run-up to Copenhagen that people don’t wake up to the danger of failure until it’s too late.”

Miliband put the blame on “the complexity of the issue”, the economic recession as well as “suspicion” between the North and the South. In light of a diplomatic pr tour around Europe “to raise the issue of climate change” Miliband warned that if the world failed to come up with an agreement to cut emissions global temperatures will increase with 4C.

“This would lead to large scale migration as parts of the world disappeared under rising seas, threaten infrastructure as extreme weather events became more common, and put pressure on natural resources such as water – all of which could have serious impacts on peace and security across the world.”

What do you think about the upcoming Climate Change Conference this December – the last chance we have to take action against “the greatest threat the world has ever faced”? Will it be a success or a failure? What are your hopes and expectations? Please share your thoughts and ideas by voting in the poll below and/or making a comment.

Simon Leufstedt
Simon Leufstedt is the founder and editor of Green Blog – an environment blog with authors from around the world. He is also the admin of Enviro Space - a place to meet, discuss and interact with other people who share your interests and ideas. Simon has previously studied Global Environmental Justice and is currently busy working with the Swedish TckTckTck organisation and learning everything there is to know about Human Ecology at the Lund University in Sweden.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSS

Subscribe to Green Blog

Green Blog has daily updates and posts from authors around the world. Get our latest posts, commentaries and articles by RSS-feed or by adding your Email to our newsletter.

Learn More

This blog post has been marked with the following tags. Click on one of the tags to learn more:

You can also learn more about this topic by browsing the post's category: Copenhagen 2009

Archives

Browse our archive of over +2 years worth of blog posts, articles and commentaries:

bg
bg

Join our green community! Meet new people, discuss various topics and make new friends that share your interests.

Comment Guideline

Comments with profanity, personal attacks or objectionable material will be edited or deleted. Feel free to refute someone's points or offer counter arguments, but please do not engage in name calling.

You can also customize your links and add some photos to your comments. Green Blog supports the following HTML tags: <a>, <b>, <i>, <u>, <em>, <p>, <blockquote>, <br>, <strong>, <strike>, <img>

We will show Disqus avatars and/or Gravatars next to your name.

Advertisement
Your Ad Here
  • ravi213
    thanks for sharing this information! it's very useful for a lot people try to understand how we can use this product.
  • skintreatment
    That reminds me of one of the scenes in the movie POWDER, when the lead character with one hand touches a dieing Deer, and with the other hand touches the person of its hunter/murderer. The emotions of the Deer in its death throes are transferred to the hunter who is also an armed police officer. For the rest of the movie the officer stands with an empty gun holster; totally stripped of his ability to slaughter another innocent animal, and knowingly left incapable of continuing as an effective officer of the law.Great scene in a great movie! Beauty Solutions
  • Let's just say I don't expect much from it.

    The UN recently issued a report saying that the rich countries in the "North" needs to pay at least $600 billions in mitigation and emission reductions in the poor and undeveloped countries in the "South". Yesterday the EU issued a statement regarding this issue. According to them the rich countries should only give €100 billions. The EU will give 30% of that sum. And in that 30% sum only €22-50 will be funded by public money, the rest will somehow come from the market.

    This is pretty much a slap in the face for the poor countries. Why should they continue the climate talks when the leading rich countries clearly aren't taking this question seriously?

    http://www.un.org/esa/policy/wess/

    Sorry only Swedish references:
    http://www.naturskyddsforeningen.se/press/press...
    http://miljoaktuellt.idg.se/2.1845/1.249591/dar...
    http://www.klimataktion.se/katastrofalt-forslag...
  • Joe the Public
    It will end as a big messy failure due to the greedy rightwing capitalists around the world.
  • yeah i will not be holdiing my breath either..........
blog comments powered by Disqus
bg
bg
Powered by WordPress. Green Blog is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike license.
Creative Commons License
bg