bg
  • Dela
Published: July 10th, 2009

During the G8 the world leaders failed to agree on specific targets for climate cuts. They only agreed on “substantially reduce” global emissions by 2050, without any legally binding targets or a roadmap. The United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon criticizes the G8 climate outcome and says it’s “not sufficient”, and that “much more needs to be done” if the world is to be able to agree on a new climate agreement during the climate talks in Copenhagen later this year.

“The time for delays and half-measures is over. The personal leadership of every Head of State or Government is needed to seize this moment to protect people and the planet from one of the most serious challenges ever to confront humanity.”

Ban Ki-moon warned in a statement, issued shortly after the G8 climate meetings, that if the world’s leaders “fail to act this year, they will have squandered a unique historical opportunity that may not come again”. But the Secretary General did welcome the G8 long term goal to reduce emissions by 80% by 2050. But said that for it to be credible it requires “ambitious mid-term targets” and “clear baselines”.

“In order to achieve such a global goal, developed countries must lead by example in making firm commitments to reduce their emissions by 2020 on the order of the 25 – 40 per cent below 1990 levels that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) tells us is required. It is disappointing to note that thus far, the mid-term emission targets announced by developed countries in the MEF are not in this range.

Every country must do its part, based on the principle of equity. Developing countries also need to contribute by undertaking national efforts to mitigate emissions that are nationally appropriate, measurable, reportable and verifiable.

Developing countries need funding and technology assistance. Funding is also needed to assist vulnerable developing countries adapt to the harmful effects of climate change.

We stand at a historical crossroads. Business as usual is no longer viable.”

Green Blog twittered during the G8 meetings and you can read all the “tweets” here.

Simon Leufstedt
Simon Leufstedt is the founder and editor of Green Blog – an environment blog with authors from around the world. He is also the admin of Enviro Space - a place to meet, discuss and interact with other people who share your interests and ideas. Simon has previously studied Global Environmental Justice and is currently busy working with the Swedish TckTckTck organisation and learning everything there is to know about Human Ecology at the Lund University in Sweden.
Advertisement

Related Posts

Advertisement
RSS

Subscribe to Green Blog

Green Blog has daily updates and posts from authors around the world. Get our latest posts, commentaries and articles by RSS-feed or by adding your Email to our newsletter.

Learn More

This blog post has been marked with the following tags. Click on one of the tags to learn more:

You can also learn more about this topic by browsing the post's category: Business & Politics

Archives

Browse our archive of over +2 years worth of blog posts, articles and commentaries:

bg
bg

Comment Guideline

Comments with profanity, personal attacks or objectionable material will be edited or deleted. Feel free to refute someone's points or offer counter arguments, but please do not engage in name calling.

You can also customize your links and add some photos to your comments. Green Blog supports the following HTML tags: <a>, <b>, <i>, <u>, <em>, <p>, <blockquote>, <br>, <strong>, <strike>, <img>

We will show Disqus avatars and/or Gravatars next to your name.

  • lighthouse10
    Well Mr Moon might have a point,
    but there is no doubt that emission reduction could be much simpler, and thereby easier to agree on!

    Sufficient first phase 2020/2030 emission reduction is achieved by acting on ELECTRICITY generation (coal, gas) and TRANSPORT (mainly automobiles) alone, since these 2 sectors typically (as in the USA) account for 80% of greenhouse gas emissions.

    The focus on electricity and transport gives several advantages:

    1. Local environmental benefit from less pollution of sulphur and all else that’s in the emissions, regardless of the less certain or immediate global benefit from CO2 reduction.

    2. Electricity supply alternatives which together with improved grid distribution gives better competition and keeps down electricity bills for consumers.

    3. Transport alternatives (using electricity, hydrogen and other energy sources), which give variety of choice and competition advantages for consumers, additionally reducing the dependency on oil imports.

    4. No trade problems: Unlike Cap and Trade, which involves cement, steel and other industries having to face imports from unregulated countries, the here suggested electricity and transport changes are not just more limited, but also largely local. Since there is little competition between say utility companies internationally, "best practice" results can be compared and shared.



    Funding and Impact
    Equity and long term loan finance can be used: Long term industrial loans from financial institutions, particularly if federal/state guaranteed, give low yearly interest repayments and lessen the effect on electricity bills or transport cost.

    Compare with
    today’s all-encompassing Cap and Trade (emission trading) suggestions, with unpredictability, expense, and needless disruption from normal business practice on one hand, or unnecessary profiteering from free allowance handouts with little actual emission reduction on the other hand - together with extensive -and unnecessary- regulation on what people can or can’t buy and use.

    Understanding why proposed Cap and Trade is bad, in USA and elsewhere
    http://www.ceolas.net/#cce5x
    Basic Idea — Offsets — Tree Planting — Manufacture Shift — Fair Trade — Surreal Market — Real Market — Allowances: Auctions + Hand-Outs — Allowance Trading — Companies: Business Stability + Business Cost — In Conclusion

    The Way Forward
    http://www.ceolas.net/#cc10x
    Introduction — Funding and Impact —No Energy Efficiency Regulation — A New Electric World
    Electricity Generation — Distribution
    Transport Power Generation — Regulation — Taxation
  • MFA
    The G8 conference was a joke. The only thing it achieved was giving the Italian PM a place to hide out for a few days away from his various sex scandals. They couldn't even pass a no-brainer resolution like this: http://thestimulist.com/resolved-the-g-8-should...
blog comments powered by Disqus
bg
bg
Twitter Bird

    Sustainability: A renewed look at locality in architecture

    By Job Mouwen on February 5th, 2010

    Photo credit: Jeremy Levine Design
    Sustainability has never reached the point where it became so imminent as it is nowadays and at the same time so unperfected in the architectural discussion. We are on the eve of an architectural revolution where situational design parameters are no longer used as a design tool to “catch” the [...]

    We must go from capitalism to socialism to tackle climate change, says Hugo Chavez

    By Simon Leufstedt on February 5th, 2010

    In an interesting interview during COP15 Amy Goodman from Democracy Now asks Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela, about his view of the climate summit in Copenhagen, climate change, USA, and the huge oil reserves in Venezuela. Watch it:

    “AMY GOODMAN: What level of emissions are you willing to support reductions of emissions?
    PRESIDENT HUGO CHAVEZ: [translated] [...]

    Climate Racism, Climate Injustice & Copenhagen Greenhouse Gas Reduction Proposals

    By Dr Gideon Polya on February 4th, 2010

    “What can decent people do to save the Planet from the Australian, EU and US climate criminals?”
    The bottom line in the Copenhagen Climate Summit should be (a) equal per capita greenhouse gas emissions for everyone and (b) an additional but equitable penalty for First World countries for their disproportionately huge historical contribution to atmospheric carbon [...]

    Green Resolutions

    By Leah Karpus on January 30th, 2010

    Photo credit: woodleywonderworks
    Chances are, you already do quite a few of these already. These ideas certainly aren’t new or ingenious. However, they are simple, easy and attainable. So if you see something new on the list, give it a go. There are always things we can work on.
    Your Two New Best Friends…
    …are your reusable [...]

    Ice, snow, so where’s the global warming?

    By People's World on December 20th, 2009

    Photo credit: laszlo-photo
    As winter weather hits us again, many people confuse the current weather (cold) with the long-term direction of the climate (warmer).
    Just because it is cold outside right now doesn’t mean that global warming isn’t real. Global warming has to do with the climate, with the long-term trend of the world’s average temperature. [...]

    World leaders apologizes for climate failure in Copenhagen ads

    By Simon Leufstedt on December 20th, 2009

    Our world leaders haven’t yet apologized for their climate failure in Copenhagen so Greenpeace and the global tcktcktck campaign have done it for them in these advertisements at the Copenhagen airport:

    “I’m sorry,” the text of the ad reads. “We could have stopped catastrophic climate change… We didn’t.”
    Some of the so called world “leaders” depicted are [...]

    Watch Hugo Chavez: Capitalism is the way to the destruction of the planet

    By Simon Leufstedt on December 19th, 2009

    Yesterday Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela, made a passionate and courageous speech at the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. Chavez criticized President Obama’s “laughable” promise to help climate change and also said that capitalism will destroy our planet. Watch it:

    Scratching the surface

    By Jonathan Sundqvist on December 17th, 2009

    I was listening to the pressconference that the European Union had the last two days. One would think that by now with all the high level people attending that they would have a clear and effective communication on what they want to achieve here in Copenhagen. More often than not the devil is in the [...]

    Naomi Klein: We want a good deal. And that’s what tomorrows demonstration is going to be about.

    By Simon Leufstedt on December 15th, 2009

    Naomi Klein speaking at the Klimaforum09 in Copenhagen.
    Tomorrow morning another large and important demonstration will be held in Copenhagen. This time the Climate Justice Action network is organizing a huge non-violent demonstration where the demonstrators are planning to march into the Bella Center, where the climate talks are being held. At the same time concerned [...]

    The “Danish text” makes developing nations furious and Naomi Klein says the deal we really need is not even on the table

    By Simon Leufstedt on December 8th, 2009

    Photo credit: adopt a negotiator
    Here are some of the biggest and most interesting news today related to the ongoing COP15 climate conference in Copenhagen:
    A draft text for a potential final agreement in Copenhagen was leaked today to the Guardian. The “Danish text” has made the developing countries “furious” as the draft agreement would give [...]

    Advertisement

    Latest Comments

    Latest Forum Topics

    Green Blog on Reddit

    Green Blog ♥ Reddit

    bg
    bg
    Powered by WordPress. Green Blog is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike license.
    Creative Commons License
    bg