<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Costing CO2 abatement &#8211; renewables, geothermal and biochar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/14/costing-co2-abatement-renewables-geothermal-and-biochar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/14/costing-co2-abatement-renewables-geothermal-and-biochar/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Forester</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/14/costing-co2-abatement-renewables-geothermal-and-biochar/comment-page-1/#comment-5292</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Forester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1349#comment-5292</guid>
		<description>After 6 months of offering stem cell therapy in combination with the venous angioplasty liberation procedure, patients of CCSVI Clinic have reported excellent health outcomes. Ms. Kasma Gianopoulos of Athens Greece, who was diagnosed with the Relapsing/Remitting form of MS in 1997 called the combination of treatments a “cure”. “I feel I am completely cured” says Ms. Gianopoulos, “my symptoms have disappeared and I have a recovery of many functions, notably my balance and my muscle strength is all coming (back). Even after six months, I feel like there are good changes happening almost every day. Before, my biggest fear was that the changes wouldn’t (hold). I don’t even worry about having a relapse anymore. I’m looking forward to a normal life with my family. I think I would call that a miracle.”Other recent MS patients who have had Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT), or stem cell therapy have posted videos and comments on YouTube. www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFQr2eqm3Cg.Dr. Avneesh Gupte, the Neurosurgeon at Noble Hospital performing the procedure has been encouraged by results in Cerebral Palsy patients as well. “We are fortunate to be able to offer the treatment because not every hospital is able to perform these types of transplants. You must have the specialized medical equipment and specially trained doctors and nurses”.  With regard to MS patients, “We are cautious, but nevertheless excited by what patients are telling us. Suffice to say that the few patients who have had the therapy through us are noticing recovery of neuro deficits beyond what the venous angioplasty only should account for”.Dr. Unmesh of Noble continues: “These are early days and certainly all evidence that the combination of liberation and stem cell therapies working together at this point is anecdotal. However I am not aware of other medical facilities in the world that offer the synthesis of both to MS patients on an approved basis and it is indeed a rare opportunity for MS patients to take advantage of a treatment that is quite possibly unique in the world”.Autologous stem cell transplantation is a procedure by which blood-forming stem cells are removed, and later injected back into the patient. All stem cells are taken from the patient themselves and cultured for later injection. In the case of a bone marrow transplant, the HSC are typically removed from the Pelvis through a large needle that can reach into the bone. The technique is referred to as a bone marrow harvest and is performed under a general anesthesia. The incidence of patients experiencing rejection is rare due to the donor and recipient being the same individual.This remains the only approved method of the SCT therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 6 months of offering stem cell therapy in combination with the venous angioplasty liberation procedure, patients of CCSVI Clinic have reported excellent health outcomes. Ms. Kasma Gianopoulos of Athens Greece, who was diagnosed with the Relapsing/Remitting form of MS in 1997 called the combination of treatments a “cure”. “I feel I am completely cured” says Ms. Gianopoulos, “my symptoms have disappeared and I have a recovery of many functions, notably my balance and my muscle strength is all coming (back). Even after six months, I feel like there are good changes happening almost every day. Before, my biggest fear was that the changes wouldn’t (hold). I don’t even worry about having a relapse anymore. I’m looking forward to a normal life with my family. I think I would call that a miracle.”Other recent MS patients who have had Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT), or stem cell therapy have posted videos and comments on YouTube. www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFQr2eqm3Cg.Dr. Avneesh Gupte, the Neurosurgeon at Noble Hospital performing the procedure has been encouraged by results in Cerebral Palsy patients as well. “We are fortunate to be able to offer the treatment because not every hospital is able to perform these types of transplants. You must have the specialized medical equipment and specially trained doctors and nurses”.  With regard to MS patients, “We are cautious, but nevertheless excited by what patients are telling us. Suffice to say that the few patients who have had the therapy through us are noticing recovery of neuro deficits beyond what the venous angioplasty only should account for”.Dr. Unmesh of Noble continues: “These are early days and certainly all evidence that the combination of liberation and stem cell therapies working together at this point is anecdotal. However I am not aware of other medical facilities in the world that offer the synthesis of both to MS patients on an approved basis and it is indeed a rare opportunity for MS patients to take advantage of a treatment that is quite possibly unique in the world”.Autologous stem cell transplantation is a procedure by which blood-forming stem cells are removed, and later injected back into the patient. All stem cells are taken from the patient themselves and cultured for later injection. In the case of a bone marrow transplant, the HSC are typically removed from the Pelvis through a large needle that can reach into the bone. The technique is referred to as a bone marrow harvest and is performed under a general anesthesia. The incidence of patients experiencing rejection is rare due to the donor and recipient being the same individual.This remains the only approved method of the SCT therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Mills</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/14/costing-co2-abatement-renewables-geothermal-and-biochar/comment-page-1/#comment-5262</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1349#comment-5262</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can it be better? No, defiantly not, this website delivers! Never found so much information in one place before. Thank You Owners! Visit us at <a href="http://www.surjo.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.surjo.com/</a> and http://www.surjo.com/tech/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/14/costing-co2-abatement-renewables-geothermal-and-biochar/comment-page-1/#comment-5021</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1349#comment-5021</guid>
		<description>You want to know all the secrets about biochar ?
This book will help !

http://www.biochar-books.com

Here practice and theory merge under a single cover of  &quot;The Biochar Revolution&quot;  and reveals hidden secrets of science called Biochar
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want to know all the secrets about biochar ?<br />
This book will help !</p>
<p><a href="http://www.biochar-books.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.biochar-books.com</a></p>
<p>Here practice and theory merge under a single cover of  &#8220;The Biochar Revolution&#8221;  and reveals hidden secrets of science called Biochar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Garjian</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/14/costing-co2-abatement-renewables-geothermal-and-biochar/comment-page-1/#comment-3967</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1349#comment-3967</guid>
		<description>Not all charcoal is biochar. True biochar is the result of heating biomass in an emission free pyrolysis reactor devoid of oxygen. Biochar has been shown to be a very effective soil amendment in numerous studies in South America and Japan. It is becoming popularized enough in the US that Biochar Xtra is now even being sold on Ebay. Others are using the bio-oils derived from biochar production to replace fossil fuels. Some folks are alarmed at the possibility of vast tracts of land being denuded to produce biochar. This is not a valid concern because, due to its very low density of from 20 to 35 pounds per cubic foot, the transport of biochar over long distances is not economically feasible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all charcoal is biochar. True biochar is the result of heating biomass in an emission free pyrolysis reactor devoid of oxygen. Biochar has been shown to be a very effective soil amendment in numerous studies in South America and Japan. It is becoming popularized enough in the US that Biochar Xtra is now even being sold on Ebay. Others are using the bio-oils derived from biochar production to replace fossil fuels. Some folks are alarmed at the possibility of vast tracts of land being denuded to produce biochar. This is not a valid concern because, due to its very low density of from 20 to 35 pounds per cubic foot, the transport of biochar over long distances is not economically feasible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Garjian</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/14/costing-co2-abatement-renewables-geothermal-and-biochar/comment-page-1/#comment-3966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1349#comment-3966</guid>
		<description>Not all charcoal is biochar. True biochar is the result of heating biomass in an emission free pyrolysis reactor devoid of oxygen. Biochar has been shown to be a very effective soil amendment in numerous studies in South America and Japan. It is becoming popularized enough in the US that Biochar Xtra is now even being sold on Ebay. Others are using the bio-oils derived from biochar production to replace fossil fuels. Some folks are alarmed at the possibility of vast tracts of land being denuded to produce biochar. This is not a valid concern because, due to its very low density of from 20 to 35 pounds per cubic foot, the transport of biochar over long distances is not economically feasible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all charcoal is biochar. True biochar is the result of heating biomass in an emission free pyrolysis reactor devoid of oxygen. Biochar has been shown to be a very effective soil amendment in numerous studies in South America and Japan. It is becoming popularized enough in the US that Biochar Xtra is now even being sold on Ebay. Others are using the bio-oils derived from biochar production to replace fossil fuels. Some folks are alarmed at the possibility of vast tracts of land being denuded to produce biochar. This is not a valid concern because, due to its very low density of from 20 to 35 pounds per cubic foot, the transport of biochar over long distances is not economically feasible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Garjian</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/14/costing-co2-abatement-renewables-geothermal-and-biochar/comment-page-1/#comment-3206</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1349#comment-3206</guid>
		<description>Not all charcoal is biochar. True biochar is the result of heating biomass in an emission free pyrolysis reactor devoid of oxygen. Biochar has been shown to be a very effective soil amendment in numerous studies in South America and Japan. It is becoming popularized enough in the US that Biochar Xtra is now even being sold on Ebay. Others are using the bio-oils derived from biochar production to replace fossil fuels. Some folks are alarmed at the possibility of vast tracts of land being denuded to produce biochar. This is not a valid concern because, due to its very low density of from 20 to 35 pounds per cubic foot, the transport of biochar over long distances is not economically feasible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all charcoal is biochar. True biochar is the result of heating biomass in an emission free pyrolysis reactor devoid of oxygen. Biochar has been shown to be a very effective soil amendment in numerous studies in South America and Japan. It is becoming popularized enough in the US that Biochar Xtra is now even being sold on Ebay. Others are using the bio-oils derived from biochar production to replace fossil fuels. Some folks are alarmed at the possibility of vast tracts of land being denuded to produce biochar. This is not a valid concern because, due to its very low density of from 20 to 35 pounds per cubic foot, the transport of biochar over long distances is not economically feasible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Garjian</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/14/costing-co2-abatement-renewables-geothermal-and-biochar/comment-page-1/#comment-3205</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1349#comment-3205</guid>
		<description>Not all charcoal is biochar. True biochar is the result of heating biomass in an emission free pyrolysis reactor devoid of oxygen. Biochar has been shown to be a very effective soil amendment in numerous studies in South America and Japan. It is becoming popularized enough in the US that Biochar Xtra is now even being sold on Ebay. Others are using the bio-oils derived from biochar production to replace fossil fuels. Some folks are alarmed at the possibility of vast tracts of land being denuded to produce biochar. This is not a valid concern because, due to its very low density of from 20 to 35 pounds per cubic foot, the transport of biochar over long distances is not economically feasible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all charcoal is biochar. True biochar is the result of heating biomass in an emission free pyrolysis reactor devoid of oxygen. Biochar has been shown to be a very effective soil amendment in numerous studies in South America and Japan. It is becoming popularized enough in the US that Biochar Xtra is now even being sold on Ebay. Others are using the bio-oils derived from biochar production to replace fossil fuels. Some folks are alarmed at the possibility of vast tracts of land being denuded to produce biochar. This is not a valid concern because, due to its very low density of from 20 to 35 pounds per cubic foot, the transport of biochar over long distances is not economically feasible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medela</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/14/costing-co2-abatement-renewables-geothermal-and-biochar/comment-page-1/#comment-3130</link>
		<dc:creator>Medela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1349#comment-3130</guid>
		<description>I had an argument about global warming the other night with a couple of friends.  I achnowleged that the world was warming somewhat and some of that was due to man, but said that any rational estimate of future warming due to man’s efforts yielded forecasts far below the catastrophic levels espoused by Al Gore (and for which he will apparently win the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday).  Their response, which I have found to be typical, was 1) it doesn’t matter how much the warming is, it is bad to change the earth at all and 2) we need to aggresively fight CO2 &quot;just in case&quot; there is some catastrophic tipping point lurking out there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem is that the costs of abating CO2 to any levels that might make a difference are both enormous and certain  (vs. global warming costs which may or may not be large and are uncertain).   Since fossil fuel production is intrinsic to economic growth, at least at current technology levels, large cuts in fossil fuel productions mean large cuts in world economic growth.  A reduction, for example, in economic growth by must 1 percentage point a year would reduce the size of the global economy by 2.5 times in a century.  And a one percentage point reduction is surely less than the true effect of the levels of CO2 cuts that catastrophists are petitioning for.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In particular, what is seldom mentioned, is that CO2 cuts of the kind suggested in Kyoto-type protocols are likely to lock over a billion people into poverty, just at the time when they are beginning to get their first experiences with prosperity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;    In 2007, human beings will consume roughly 15 terawatts of energy worldwide. That level of energy use will rise rapidly over the next 100 years due to population growth and increasing living standards, especially among the global poor. By the year 2100, humankind will need to produce and consume roughly 60 terawatts of energy if every human on earth is to reach the level of prosperity enjoyed today by the world’s wealthiest one billion people. Even if economies were to become much more efficient, the total terawatts needed to bring all of humankind out of poverty would still need to roughly double by 2050 and triple by century’s end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had an argument about global warming the other night with a couple of friends.  I achnowleged that the world was warming somewhat and some of that was due to man, but said that any rational estimate of future warming due to man’s efforts yielded forecasts far below the catastrophic levels espoused by Al Gore (and for which he will apparently win the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday).  Their response, which I have found to be typical, was 1) it doesn’t matter how much the warming is, it is bad to change the earth at all and 2) we need to aggresively fight CO2 &#8220;just in case&#8221; there is some catastrophic tipping point lurking out there.</p>
<p>The problem is that the costs of abating CO2 to any levels that might make a difference are both enormous and certain  (vs. global warming costs which may or may not be large and are uncertain).   Since fossil fuel production is intrinsic to economic growth, at least at current technology levels, large cuts in fossil fuel productions mean large cuts in world economic growth.  A reduction, for example, in economic growth by must 1 percentage point a year would reduce the size of the global economy by 2.5 times in a century.  And a one percentage point reduction is surely less than the true effect of the levels of CO2 cuts that catastrophists are petitioning for.</p>
<p>In particular, what is seldom mentioned, is that CO2 cuts of the kind suggested in Kyoto-type protocols are likely to lock over a billion people into poverty, just at the time when they are beginning to get their first experiences with prosperity.</p>
<p>    In 2007, human beings will consume roughly 15 terawatts of energy worldwide. That level of energy use will rise rapidly over the next 100 years due to population growth and increasing living standards, especially among the global poor. By the year 2100, humankind will need to produce and consume roughly 60 terawatts of energy if every human on earth is to reach the level of prosperity enjoyed today by the world’s wealthiest one billion people. Even if economies were to become much more efficient, the total terawatts needed to bring all of humankind out of poverty would still need to roughly double by 2050 and triple by century’s end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erich J. Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/14/costing-co2-abatement-renewables-geothermal-and-biochar/comment-page-1/#comment-2782</link>
		<dc:creator>Erich J. Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1349#comment-2782</guid>
		<description>One aspect of Biochar systems are Cheep, clean biomass stoves that produce biochar and no respiratory disease. At scale, the health benifits are greater than ending Malaria.
A great example;

http://www.unccd.int/publicinfo/poznanclimatetalks/docs/Natural%20Draft%20Stove.pdf

Also , I would like the BioFuelWatch folks to read the petition of 1500 Cameroon Farmers;

The Biochar Fund
http://biocharfund.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=40&amp;Itemid=60

The USDA-ARS have dozens of studies happening now to ferrt out the reasons for char affinity with MYC fungi and microbes, but this synergy is solidly shown by the Japanese work, literaly showing 1+1=4

This is what I try to get across to Farmers, as to how I feel about the act of returning carbon to the soil. An act of pertinence and thankfulness for the civilization we have created. Farmers are the Soil Sink Bankers, once carbon has a price, they will be laughing all the way to it.

Biotic Carbon, the carbon transformed by life, should never be combusted, oxidized and destroyed. It deserves more respect, reverence even, and understanding to use it back to the soil where 2/3 of excess atmospheric carbon originally came from. We all know we are carbon-centered life, we seldom think about the complex web of recycled bio-carbon which is the true center of life. A cradle to cradle, mutually co-evolved biosphere reaching into every crack and crevice on Earth.

It’s hard for most to revere microbes and fungus, but from our toes to our gums (onward), their balanced ecology is our health. The greater earth and soils are just as dependent, at much longer time scales. Our farming for over 10,000 years has been responsible for 2/3rds of our excess greenhouse gases. This soil carbon, converted to carbon dioxide, Methane &amp; Nitrous oxide began a slow stable warming that now accelerates with burning of fossil fuel.

Biochar viewed as soil Infrastructure; The old saw; “Feed the Soil Not the Plants” becomes; “Feed, Cloth and House the Soil, utilities included !”. Free Carbon Condominiums with carboxyl group fats in the pantry and hydroxyl alcohol in the mini bar., build it and the Wee-Beasties will come. As one microbiologist said on the Biochar list; “Microbes like to sit down when they eat”. By setting this table we expand husbandry to whole new orders of life.
Thanks for your attentions,
Erich J. Knight
Shenandoah Gardens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One aspect of Biochar systems are Cheep, clean biomass stoves that produce biochar and no respiratory disease. At scale, the health benifits are greater than ending Malaria.<br />
A great example;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.unccd.int/publicinfo/poznanclimatetalks/docs/Natural%20Draft%20Stove.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.unccd.int/publicinfo/poznanclimatetalks/docs/Natural%20Draft%20Stove.pdf</a></p>
<p>Also , I would like the BioFuelWatch folks to read the petition of 1500 Cameroon Farmers;</p>
<p>The Biochar Fund<br />
<a href="http://biocharfund.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=40&#038;Itemid=60" rel="nofollow">http://biocharfund.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=40&#038;Itemid=60</a></p>
<p>The USDA-ARS have dozens of studies happening now to ferrt out the reasons for char affinity with MYC fungi and microbes, but this synergy is solidly shown by the Japanese work, literaly showing 1+1=4</p>
<p>This is what I try to get across to Farmers, as to how I feel about the act of returning carbon to the soil. An act of pertinence and thankfulness for the civilization we have created. Farmers are the Soil Sink Bankers, once carbon has a price, they will be laughing all the way to it.</p>
<p>Biotic Carbon, the carbon transformed by life, should never be combusted, oxidized and destroyed. It deserves more respect, reverence even, and understanding to use it back to the soil where 2/3 of excess atmospheric carbon originally came from. We all know we are carbon-centered life, we seldom think about the complex web of recycled bio-carbon which is the true center of life. A cradle to cradle, mutually co-evolved biosphere reaching into every crack and crevice on Earth.</p>
<p>It’s hard for most to revere microbes and fungus, but from our toes to our gums (onward), their balanced ecology is our health. The greater earth and soils are just as dependent, at much longer time scales. Our farming for over 10,000 years has been responsible for 2/3rds of our excess greenhouse gases. This soil carbon, converted to carbon dioxide, Methane &amp; Nitrous oxide began a slow stable warming that now accelerates with burning of fossil fuel.</p>
<p>Biochar viewed as soil Infrastructure; The old saw; “Feed the Soil Not the Plants” becomes; “Feed, Cloth and House the Soil, utilities included !”. Free Carbon Condominiums with carboxyl group fats in the pantry and hydroxyl alcohol in the mini bar., build it and the Wee-Beasties will come. As one microbiologist said on the Biochar list; “Microbes like to sit down when they eat”. By setting this table we expand husbandry to whole new orders of life.<br />
Thanks for your attentions,<br />
Erich J. Knight<br />
Shenandoah Gardens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Leufstedt</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2009/04/14/costing-co2-abatement-renewables-geothermal-and-biochar/comment-page-1/#comment-2757</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Leufstedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.green-blog.org/?p=1349#comment-2757</guid>
		<description>Another interesting post! What I found most surprising was James Lovelock&#039;s comment about nuclear energy: 

&lt;i&gt;&quot;It is a way for the UK to solve its energy problems, but it is not a global cure for climate change. It is too late for emissions reduction measures.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

George Monbiot has also written about charcoal aka biochar: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/mar/24/george-monbiot-climate-change-biochar&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Woodchips with everything. It&#039;s the Atkins plan of the low-carbon world&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/mar/27/biochar-monbiot-global-warming&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Charleaders must cool enthusiasm for settting fire to the planet&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another interesting post! What I found most surprising was James Lovelock&#8217;s comment about nuclear energy: </p>
<p><i>&#8220;It is a way for the UK to solve its energy problems, but it is not a global cure for climate change. It is too late for emissions reduction measures.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>George Monbiot has also written about charcoal aka biochar: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/mar/24/george-monbiot-climate-change-biochar" rel="nofollow">Woodchips with everything. It&#8217;s the Atkins plan of the low-carbon world</a> and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/mar/27/biochar-monbiot-global-warming" rel="nofollow">Charleaders must cool enthusiasm for settting fire to the planet</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

