bg
  • Buzz this!
  • Dela
Published: September 11th, 2008

Six billion people. That’s the current human population on Earth, and the highest ever reached as well. Things start to get cramped in the cities, while there is everywhere a noticeable depressing atmosphere due to having too many people around, whether that’s in a traffic jam, in shops, at public services etc.

The number of six billion human lives would never have been reached if it wasn’t for fossil fuels. The energy sent by the sun and received by the Earth every day could ever sustain more than two billion people. Fossil fuels combine a sort of energy saved below the surface of the planet, now extracted by humans to use this energy and cover their needs. And with all needs easily covered, humanity was and is able to rise in population.

But there is a great difference of four billion people between the number of humans the planet can sustain and the number of humans existing, a fact that has a bad impact on the Earth. Using fossil fuels releases huge amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. And since there are so many people on Earth, there are more and more gas emissions. All this leads to global warming, climate change and pollution in general.

Even if overpopulation didn’t cause environmental problems of that kind, there are other consequences to be taken into account. And that’s because all these people need accommodation, private space, public areas and services, fields and farms to produce food. All this space needed is taken from ecosystems, mostly by deforestrating large areas. This act alone is enough to reduce the amount of oxygen produced by plants, and the space that natural habitats used to cover.

Artemis Mindrinou
Advertisement

Related Posts

Advertisement
RSS

Subscribe to Green Blog

Green Blog has daily updates and posts from authors around the world. Get our latest posts, commentaries and articles by RSS-feed or by adding your Email to our newsletter.

Learn More

This blog post has been marked with the following tags. Click on one of the tags to learn more:

You can also learn more about this topic by browsing the post's category: Culture & Celebrity

Archives

Browse our archive of over +2 years worth of blog posts, articles and commentaries:

bg
bg

Join our green community! Meet new people, discuss various topics and make new friends that share your interests.

Comment Guideline

Comments with profanity, personal attacks or objectionable material will be edited or deleted. Feel free to refute someone's points or offer counter arguments, but please do not engage in name calling.

You can also customize your links and add some photos to your comments. Green Blog supports the following HTML tags: <a>, <b>, <i>, <u>, <em>, <p>, <blockquote>, <br>, <strong>, <strike>, <img>

We will show Disqus avatars and/or Gravatars next to your name.

Advertisement
Your Ad Here
  • I agree with Nathaniel. The rapid industrial and the non responsible way it used and still using energy resources are the cause for the pollution disaster. There are many power resources that are much cleaner than using fossil based energy.
  • A good discussion of the population crisis
  • Nathaniel
    Actually I totally disagree with this article. It has been said enough solar energy hits the Earth in 1 hour to power the total human civilization for 1 year. That is very very different from what you have said.

    About fossil fuels, most of those aren't burned by those nations where many are poor and birth control is rare (if there at all). But by high consuming nations were the number of children per family is low but the number of TVs, cars, and other consumer goods per family is high.

    China didn't get to challenge the USA from for the position of largest polluter of the world by growing its population, it did so by encouraging its people to have less children and more cars.

    1 child policy + rapid industrial development = environmental disaster
  • Yes, solar energy hitting the Earth's surface per day WOULD be enough to sustain human population for 1 year IF the whole amount was collected by devices and saved to be used. But most of solar energy is absorbed by plants, which is perfectly rational and totally needed for us to survive.
    Plus, you should take into consideration the ammount of sun-rays (thus solar energy and heat) that has to be reflected and get back in space.
    Moreover, we should always have in mind that we have not developed the technology required to collect solar energy as we should have. Thus, even if the daily amount of solar energy coming to Earth was to be used only by humans and was not to leave the atmosphere, we would still be unable to use it.

    In short, only a very specific amount of solar energy can be saved and used as Alternative Sources of Energy. That is why the Earth could never possibly sustain 6 billion people without fossil fuels.
  • You know, after everything we talk about, day-in and day-out, it seems like this my ultimately be the only issue that really matters.

    Would we even be talking about global warming and deforestation and empty fisheries if our population now was the same it was 100 years ago?
  • Actually another very important man-made factor called Nitrogen fixing allowed larger numbers of people to be supported on this planet. Thanks to the American government. After WWII the US had a surplus of nitrogen used in bomb making, so we turned it into fertilizer and voila more crops to support more people. See the web link for more information.
  • Thanks for the article, overpopulation is a serious concern.
  • Hi, you've addressed a major issue here. It's hard to determine what we could possibly do in terms of humane birth control. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like the world population is going to be slowing down at any time soon.

    What we need to do is find new energy sources, and live greener so that we can keep our planet healthy. 4 billion people aren't going to just disappear!

    We've started a green project over at Go Green Street, and we'd love to have you come visit! I'll be back soon - Joe
  • Ken Clive
    We need more education in more places, especially countries with a lower standard of living where birth control is pretty much unheard of. Good thing people like Bono (whom some consider "crazy" but is actually doing something great for this world) are opening schools in Africa and educating those people about what difference they can make in the world just by having less kids.

    The main reason for birth rates to slide down in the US is because of the now astronomical cost of raising children decently; this was not a factor in, say, the 1990s, when I was growing up.
  • Good article thanks, visit my site for green articles!

    http://www.stayinggreen.org/
  • In many first-world countries, the birth rates are already falling. Some countries even have birthrates below the replacement rate (2.1 kids per couple). Hopefully, as more places become first-world, their birth rates will see a similar decrease.
  • Overpopulation is the biggest factor in human-caused environmental problems. Even if we were a totally nontechnological society, 6 billion large omnivorous mammals would be catastrophic to the global ecosystem. Finding humane ways to lower birthrates and bring the population down to sustainable levels will be the most critical endeavor for humankind in the long term.
blog comments powered by Disqus
bg
bg
Powered by WordPress. Green Blog is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike license.
Creative Commons License
bg
bigger defroster bombardier brand chisels caraway ancestors beatitude cilantro dishtowel cries cashews capoeira amici chorea commuting alternating aventure dure addicts bachelors bi capable bullfrogs arias cation cocked cummin chasse cig customs backing clings barbs breather choosing blindfolded cash banks accuracy constitution apophysis dermatologists assessed dime concerto cushions claymore bangle actinomycete desired count cozen caroler crag cit armature conflict beautiful brownstones cardiogenic bundt cornice dazzler dojos dumping celebration dozen checksum didy droopy cod bionic convector carnage braze cops anana archway capris abroad cracked demo cask deaerator corpse consular credits coitus beluga codecs conservancy bad aster autobiography controller cuddle cutthroat drab contract acclaim angina atria depressed bind crocket diva chiropractors carnation collapsible ebonite commanders discounts casitas animal chandelier champs determining barret cultivator constabulary combo default axle dewberry bigfoot complication barriers ail cowry dress copycat biding cheetah commodity cupboard dieses appliques arts clem baccarat brainteaser certain autographs aggressive ascorbate dah cloner cyma crossfire chronological directorate drawbar carob abnormalities battleship cranium cion caliph casts beezer culturally care duet bromeliad buttes beadwork dying credenza broach adding brevete durant aspirin alum dickie dressy crue departures crowd dread clubhouse ego bents capsicum cube carpal cyberspace dicks brasil diverticulosis brim bacharach dues deer charismatic cite bullfighting dorado dependency consort donate clough debates cheek border cantilever board dentist carters drier burgess cacti attest blunder correspondence bicker depressants choir bears ashram colloidal airbrush ejaculates dinosaurs baseman differentiate brach drinkers colostomy doors ate chime chorionic