bg
  • Buzz this!
  • Dela
Published: September 1st, 2008

Of the 55 Gold Medal-winning countries (Groups A and B) a total of 37/55 i.e. 67% have been involved in the occupation of other countries in the post-1945 era (mostly associated with European and American colonialism and imperialism). For a detailed history of the US contribution to this criminality see William Blum’s “Rogue State”. For a detailed history and “body count” of this horrendous burden of war, occupation, devastation and genocide imposed by imperialist powers since 1945 see “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1905”. 1990-2005 avoidable deaths (excess deaths, deaths that should not have happened) in non-European countries total 1.2 billion, this including a Muslim Holocaust involving 0.6 billion avoidable deaths.

In contrast, all the Medal-free Group D countries (with the exception of Peru and Saudi Arabia and the tiny European principalities of Andorra, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco and San Marino) have been subject to overwhelmingly European and American colonial occupation and its horrendous consequences in the post-war era. Further, there are many countries in the other Groups that have been subject to foreign occupation and malignant foreign (mainly American) intervention in the post-1945 era.

The huge impact of European colonial occupation and post-colonial neo-colonialism is reflected in the vastly lower annual per capita fossil fuel-derived CO2 pollution in these countries (except, Nigeria and Indonesia aside, for those with big tourism or oil industries).

One can sum the 1950-2005 excess deaths in all the countries occupied by foreign occupiers in the post-war era – for a country-by-country analysis see: http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/2008/08/body-count-global-avoidable-mortality.html . Most of the perpetrators have been European countries and are listed below alphabetically with both their number of Gold Medals from the 2008 Beijing Olympics and their “body count” of 1990-2005 excess deaths in the countries they occupied as major occupiers for some time in the post-war era (excluding Germany and Japan as occupied countries): Australia (14 Gold, 2.1 million in Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands); Belgium (1 Gold, 36.0 million); Ethiopia (4 Gold, 1.8 million in Eritrea); France (7 Gold, 142.3 million); Indonesia (1 Gold, 0.694 million in Timor Leste); Iraq (0 Gold, 0.1 million in Kuwait); Israel (0 Gold, 23.9 million); Netherlands (7 Gold, 71.6 million); New Zealand (3 Gold, 0.04 million in Samoa); Pakistan (0 Gold, 52.2 million in Bangladesh); Portugal (1 Gold, 23.5 million); Russia (23 Gold, 37.1 million); South Africa (0.7 million in Namibia); Spain (5 Gold, 8.6 million); Turkey (1 Gold, 0.05 million in Cyprus); the UK (19 Gold, 727.4 million); and the US (36 Gold, 82.2 million).

For the record, neither China (51 Gold medals, Iran (1 Gold medal) nor India (1 Gold medal) have occupied any other country over the last few centuries.

If there were Gold Medals for War, Occupation and Genocide, the leading Gold medallists scoring over 1 million on this 1990-2005 excess mortality score would be, in descending order, the UK, France, the US, Netherlands, Pakistan, Russia, Belgium, Israel, Portugal and Spain … or if Gold, Silver and Bronze were given for “total body count” the UK would get Gold, France the Silver and the US the Bronze (for discussion see “No Medals for War, Occupation and Genocide. Olympic Gold Medal Tally Analyzed”).

Those familiar with notoriously corrupt sports such as horse racing know that there are 2 ways of succeeding, specifically (1) by investing money in quality horses, trainers and jockeys and (2) by nobbling the opposition. As outlined above, two thirds of the Gold medal-winning countries have been involved in (1) huge investment in sport (e.g. Australia is reported to have spent $100 million for each of its 14 Gold Medals) and in (2) the occupation and devastation of other countries (mostly impoverished African, Latin American, South Asian and Muslim countries) which in consequence do very poorly at the Olympic Games (e.g. highly successful Gold Medal-winning Australia has been involved in all post-1950 US Asian wars that have been associated – so far – with 25 million Indigenous Asian excess deaths).

The World average for “Gold Medals per Million of 2005 Population” is 302/ 6,450 million = 0.047 but notably the top Gold Medal winner China (0.039) scored below this. The top countries in terms of “Gold Medals per Million of 2005 Population” were Jamaica (2.222), Bahrain (1.326), Estonia (0.775), New Zealand (0.763), Mongolia (0.749) and Australia (0.697). The Gold Medal-winning countries with the lowest scores (in descending order) were Mexico (0.019), Brazil (0.016), Turkey (0.014), Iran (0.014), Indonesia (0.0044) and India (0.00091).

India’s last position in the Olympic Games “Gold Medals per Million of Population” list of Gold medal-winning countries says is consistent with the moral view that huge investment in sport (as reflected in Gold Medals) is utterly unconscionable in a world in which 44,000 people die avoidably each day from deprivation and deprivation-exacerbated disease (see “Global avoidable mortality”). Saving human life is vastly more important than winning Gold Medals in a technically and morally flawed competition.

In terms of “2005 annual per capita fossil fuel-derived CO2 pollution in tonnes per person per year” China (4.07) is just below the world’s average (4.37).

Multiplying “Gold Medals per Million of 2005 Population” [Gold] by the “2005 annual per capita fossil fuel-derived CO2 pollution in tonnes per person per year” [CO2] gives a GoldxCO2 score that can be seen as a Gold Medal Extravagance Index, Profligacy Index or Excess Index – a measure of how much countries are prepared to pollute our common atmosphere and ocean with carbon dioxide in order to win “Gold Glory”.

The World average for GoldxCO2 is 0.201 and again China (0.159) falls just under this value. The most profligate countries in descending order are Bahrain (48.505), Australia (14.107), Estonia (10.982), Jamaica (9.377), Norway (7.478), New Zealand (7.149) and the Netherlands (7.053). The least profligate Gold Medal winners in terms of GoldxCO2 score in ascending order are India (0.0010), Ethiopia (0.0032), Indonesia (0.0069), Cameroon (0.0230) and Brazil (0.0310).

Hopefully these Gold Medal Extravagance Index figures can restore a sense of balance and humanity to analysis of the Beijing Olympic Games Medal Tally. Some Medals were decided by as little as 0.01 second difference in some events. However there is no doubt that in terms of the “Green-ness” of Gold Medal winners as measured by the GoldxCO2 Extravagance Index, India unequivocally scored Gold, Ethiopia Silver and Indonesia Bronze.

Dr Gideon Polya published some 130 works in a 4 decade scientific career, most recently a huge pharmacological reference text “Biochemical Targets of Plant Bioactive Compounds” (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, New York & London, 2003). He has just published “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950” (G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007: http://mwcnews.net and http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com);
see also his contribution “Australian complicity in Iraq mass mortality” in “Lies, Deep Fries & Statistics” (edited by Robyn Williams, ABC Books, Sydney, 2007). He is currently preparing a revised and updated version of his 1998 book “Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History” as biofuel-, globalization- and climate-driven global food price increases threaten a possibly 100-fold greater famine catastrophe than the man-made famine in British-ruled India that killed 6-7 million Indians in the “forgotten” World War 2 Bengal Famine (see recent BBC broadcast involving Dr Polya, Economics Nobel Laureate Professor Amartya Sen and others).

Pages: 1 2 3

Dr Gideon Polya
Dr Gideon Polya published some 130 works in a 4 decade scientific career, most recently a huge pharmacological reference text "Biochemical Targets of Plant Bioactive Compounds". He has recently published “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950”; see also his contribution “Australian complicity in Iraq mass mortality” in “Lies, Deep Fries & Statistics”. He has just published a revised and updated 2008 version of his 1998 book “Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History” as biofuel-, globalization- and climate-driven global food price increases threaten a greater famine catastrophe than the man-made famine in British-ruled India that killed 6-7 million Indians in the “forgotten” World War 2 Bengal Famine (see recent BBC broadcast involving Dr Polya, Economics Nobel Laureate Professor Amartya Sen and others). When words fail one can say it in pictures - for images of Gideon Polya’s huge paintings for Peace and for Mother and Child see “Truth , Beauty & Saving the World – Science, Art & Nuclear, Greenhouse & Poverty Threats”).
Advertisement

Related Posts

Advertisement
RSS

Subscribe to Green Blog

Green Blog has daily updates and posts from authors around the world. Get our latest posts, commentaries and articles by RSS-feed or by adding your Email to our newsletter.

Learn More

This blog post has been marked with the following tags. Click on one of the tags to learn more:

You can also learn more about this topic by browsing the post's category: Culture & Celebrity

Archives

Browse our archive of over +2 years worth of blog posts, articles and commentaries:

bg
bg

Join our green community! Meet new people, discuss various topics and make new friends that share your interests.

Comment Guideline

Comments with profanity, personal attacks or objectionable material will be edited or deleted. Feel free to refute someone's points or offer counter arguments, but please do not engage in name calling.

You can also customize your links and add some photos to your comments. Green Blog supports the following HTML tags: <a>, <b>, <i>, <u>, <em>, <p>, <blockquote>, <br>, <strong>, <strike>, <img>

We will show Disqus avatars and/or Gravatars next to your name.

Advertisement
Your Ad Here
  • save your future by saving your wealth physically best choice is gold
    Thanks for the great reading, we buy gold in a recession. I will pass this on to our ira clients to read
  • Chill dude, your bias is showing... I admire your tenacity for humanitarianism but we are on an environmental blog, yah?

    I was just pointing out that you're punishing the environmental innocents while making some of the guilty ones slip away.

    Leave the innocents out of it or at least exonerate them. Don't let your bias show you to be passing over some of the guilty ones at the same time as you're flogging the innocents. It's bad for you and bad for the environmental movement at the same time.
  • The Green-ness Index presented is simply the product of 2 variables and obviously can conceivably yield the same result with particular High Gold/Low CO2 and Low Gold/High CO2 combinations.

    It is merely a start at a more objective analysis of the global realities involved and the obscenity of massive, nationalist investment in irrelevant and flawed competition in a starving and dangerously polluted world.

    It also shows up the dishonesty of lying, racist, holocaust-ignoring Mainstream media that report such flawed competitions with extraordinary precision (e.g. event times to the nearest 0.01 second) but ignore the horrendous concurrent realities e.g. the "annual death rate" is 6.2% for under-5 year old infants in US-, UK-, NATO- and Australian-occupied Afghanistan as compared to 10.2% for Australian prisoners of war of the Japanese in World War 2 (for which war crime Japanese generals were tried and hanged).
  • Not commenting on possible motives, but I think there are too many biases in this posting that seem to make the top outliers overly eco-unfriendly and the bottom outliers overly eco-friendly.

    1st, India - winner of 0 gold medals, and China - winner of the most gold medals: Both are emerging as the worst possible environmental enemies but this fact is masked by the gold medals/capita which makes India seem overly concerned about humanity and the environment and China seem overly incompetent with respects to its ability to win gold medals. India did not send a capable Olympic team simply because it has neither the resources, interest, nor the cohesion to assemble an effective Olympic team. On the other hand China is simply too populous to rate high on any of the scores except for raw medal standings despite the huge amount of effort spent in producing Olympic athletes.

    2nd, Jamaica - top gold medal per capita winner, and Indonesia near the bottom of the pile for the same.
    These two countries have very little basis for comparison except that both are primarily recipients of exploitation by others mentioned in this posting. Jamaica's high per capita gold medal rating is due not to resources spend on producing gold medalists but on the ability of the country's natural environment to create good sprinters. A high per capita of naturally good sprinters should naturally produce a high per capita gold medal ranking. The countries CO2 excess is also a product of the exploitation by others and when combine with such a high per capita gold medal number makes it appear extraordinarily high on the profligacy list. On the other hand, the aforementioned exploitation so oppresses the Indonesian people that despite the countries abundance of natural wealth, very little of it ever trickles down to allow the population to seriously contend for Olympic Gold. So, Indonesia's appearance at the bottom of the profligacy rating is hardly worth mentioning despite its poor environmental record (again most of its CO2 excess is incurred by countries that are currently subjecting it to crushing exploitation).
    In summary its good to remember that 1 divide by any number greater than 1 is always less than 1, and any number divided by any other sufficiently larger number is always almost 0. The devil is in the details and when your making a detailed analysis, you must not forget the details.
blog comments powered by Disqus
bg
bg
Powered by WordPress. Green Blog is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike license.
Creative Commons License
bg