<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review: Climate Code Red &#8211; the case for a sustainability emergency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best Woodworking Plans</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-4922</link>
		<dc:creator>Best Woodworking Plans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/#comment-4922</guid>
		<description>Badly, global average temperature is about 1oC above the pre-industrial and increasing at about 0.25 oC per decade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Badly, global average temperature is about 1oC above the pre-industrial and increasing at about 0.25 oC per decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modular home floor plans</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-4116</link>
		<dc:creator>Modular home floor plans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/#comment-4116</guid>
		<description>Having been involved with global warming climate change as a researcher in environmental health for 25 years, I can say that this is without question by far the best book to date on this issue—the first book to have the integrity to say how the situation really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been involved with global warming climate change as a researcher in environmental health for 25 years, I can say that this is without question by far the best book to date on this issue—the first book to have the integrity to say how the situation really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Climate Safety: We must rapidly decarbonise our society, preserve global sinks</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Climate Safety: We must rapidly decarbonise our society, preserve global sinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/#comment-2098</guid>
		<description>[...] a new and updated version of last year&#8217;s climate report, Climate Code Red, will be released. The Climate Safety report from the Public Interest Research Center (PIRC), an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a new and updated version of last year&#8217;s climate report, Climate Code Red, will be released. The Climate Safety report from the Public Interest Research Center (PIRC), an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Book Review: &#8220;Climate Code Red - the case for emergency action&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-1906</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Book Review: &#8220;Climate Code Red - the case for emergency action&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 23:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/#comment-1906</guid>
		<description>[...] months ago on Green Blog I reviewed &#8220;Climate Code Red – the case for a sustainability emergency&#8221; by David Spratt and Phillip Sutton (Friends of the Earth, Melbourne). This important, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months ago on Green Blog I reviewed &#8220;Climate Code Red – the case for a sustainability emergency&#8221; by David Spratt and Phillip Sutton (Friends of the Earth, Melbourne). This important, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Australia 2020 Summit: 25 Ideas for Greening Climate Criminal Australia</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Australia 2020 Summit: 25 Ideas for Greening Climate Criminal Australia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/#comment-601</guid>
		<description>[...] This was indeed an important opportunity because Australia and the World are facing a Climate Emergency and Sustainability Emergency as cogently outlined in the recent book “Climate Code Red – the case for a sustainability emergency” by David Spratt and Philip Sutton (see: ; for my book review on Green Blog see: climatecodered.net ; for a review of this book see Green Blog). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This was indeed an important opportunity because Australia and the World are facing a Climate Emergency and Sustainability Emergency as cogently outlined in the recent book “Climate Code Red – the case for a sustainability emergency” by David Spratt and Philip Sutton (see: ; for my book review on Green Blog see: climatecodered.net ; for a review of this book see Green Blog). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cloudy</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>cloudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/#comment-604</guid>
		<description>To see what a future looks like where these necessary emergency measures have NOT been implemented in a timely way, read Walt Whitman&#039;s antiutopian description of a world where a Tory Horse-shit elite have wrecked the environment &#039;so that they might preside over the ruins&#039;, and essentially enslaved mankind in &quot;Respondez! Respondez!&quot;

See:
http://www.bartleby.com/142/320.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To see what a future looks like where these necessary emergency measures have NOT been implemented in a timely way, read Walt Whitman&#8217;s antiutopian description of a world where a Tory Horse-shit elite have wrecked the environment &#8216;so that they might preside over the ruins&#8217;, and essentially enslaved mankind in &#8220;Respondez! Respondez!&#8221;</p>
<p>See:<br />
<a href="http://www.bartleby.com/142/320.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bartleby.com/142/320.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cloudy</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>cloudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Obviously, the mainstream solutions advocated -- including by &quot;progressives&quot; and reformers of various hues, from the Democrats&#039; 80% reduction of GHG emissions by 2050 to the extreme forward position of Norway&#039;s goal of net ZERO CO2 emissions by 2030 are CATASTROPHICALLY insufficient.    I have sent a letter to the editor of the &lt;i&gt;NY Times &lt;/i&gt; in response to an editorial on a surprise collapse of ice in Antarctica, and will do so in response to future topical editorials when relevant -- insisting on this program of NET NEGATIVE GLOBAL GHG emissions ASAP.    I doubt they will print it by they might print a letter or even an oped piece  by Jim Hansen, or Dr Polya, or the authors of &lt;i&gt; Climate Code Red &lt;/i&gt;.

I urge others to write letters on this issue, with links citing sources and books like the abovementioned to major mainstream publications including the &lt;i&gt; New York Times &lt;/i&gt;, as if they receive dozens of letters on this in response to EVERY editorial on global warming, they will feel obliged to print at least ONE representative letter.   The same is true of other mainstream publications.

Further, using c/c&#039;s of press coverage of this concern, as well as the book and copies of statements and reports by Jim Hansen, progressive organizations (like the anti-imperialist sds/mds, students for a democratic society/movement for a democratic society that has recently been restarted nationally in the US for the first time since the 60s), but also others, across the world, from Green Parties to environmental groups and churches and unions at all levels should be urged to at least call for the solutions that Jim Hansen and others have made clear are necessary.

If these concerns can at least become part of the &#039;standard fare&#039; of progressive media and institutions and discourse, then mainstream institutions will be forced to respond.

I will be VERY frank and note that even if the system is responsive beyond even the rosiest of notions (remember how disappointing the CLINTON administration was on the environment, including global warming, after Gore on the ticket raised some hopes) -- the kinds of changes that will be needed will require an additional EXTREMELY HIGH level of militancy supported by HUGE mass-based movements.     I confess that I am less than optimistic.

For a picture of what an anti-utopia, where nature has been destroyed by a &quot;Tory Horse-shit&quot; elite so that they can preside over the ruins, see Walt Whitman&#039;s: &quot;Respondez! Respondez!&quot;

See:  http://www.bartleby.com/142/320.html

 To avoid such an outcome, the kind of confrontation with the massive underground repression in advanced industrial societies that progressives are too squeamish and/or too scared to do now will be ABSOLUTELY necessary.     There are many requisites of this nature, and they will require a revolution not just in the social system, but first in the way that AUTHENTIC progressives think, and in our insistence on authenticity in order to build the kinds of movements that we need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, the mainstream solutions advocated &#8212; including by &#8220;progressives&#8221; and reformers of various hues, from the Democrats&#8217; 80% reduction of GHG emissions by 2050 to the extreme forward position of Norway&#8217;s goal of net ZERO CO2 emissions by 2030 are CATASTROPHICALLY insufficient.    I have sent a letter to the editor of the <i>NY Times </i> in response to an editorial on a surprise collapse of ice in Antarctica, and will do so in response to future topical editorials when relevant &#8212; insisting on this program of NET NEGATIVE GLOBAL GHG emissions ASAP.    I doubt they will print it by they might print a letter or even an oped piece  by Jim Hansen, or Dr Polya, or the authors of <i> Climate Code Red </i>.</p>
<p>I urge others to write letters on this issue, with links citing sources and books like the abovementioned to major mainstream publications including the <i> New York Times </i>, as if they receive dozens of letters on this in response to EVERY editorial on global warming, they will feel obliged to print at least ONE representative letter.   The same is true of other mainstream publications.</p>
<p>Further, using c/c&#8217;s of press coverage of this concern, as well as the book and copies of statements and reports by Jim Hansen, progressive organizations (like the anti-imperialist sds/mds, students for a democratic society/movement for a democratic society that has recently been restarted nationally in the US for the first time since the 60s), but also others, across the world, from Green Parties to environmental groups and churches and unions at all levels should be urged to at least call for the solutions that Jim Hansen and others have made clear are necessary.</p>
<p>If these concerns can at least become part of the &#8216;standard fare&#8217; of progressive media and institutions and discourse, then mainstream institutions will be forced to respond.</p>
<p>I will be VERY frank and note that even if the system is responsive beyond even the rosiest of notions (remember how disappointing the CLINTON administration was on the environment, including global warming, after Gore on the ticket raised some hopes) &#8212; the kinds of changes that will be needed will require an additional EXTREMELY HIGH level of militancy supported by HUGE mass-based movements.     I confess that I am less than optimistic.</p>
<p>For a picture of what an anti-utopia, where nature has been destroyed by a &#8220;Tory Horse-shit&#8221; elite so that they can preside over the ruins, see Walt Whitman&#8217;s: &#8220;Respondez! Respondez!&#8221;</p>
<p>See:  <a href="http://www.bartleby.com/142/320.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bartleby.com/142/320.html</a></p>
<p> To avoid such an outcome, the kind of confrontation with the massive underground repression in advanced industrial societies that progressives are too squeamish and/or too scared to do now will be ABSOLUTELY necessary.     There are many requisites of this nature, and they will require a revolution not just in the social system, but first in the way that AUTHENTIC progressives think, and in our insistence on authenticity in order to build the kinds of movements that we need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Gideon Polya</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Gideon Polya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/#comment-602</guid>
		<description>While the absolute amount of global food production is maximal, the price of grain has increased enormously in recent years (the price of wheat doubled in the last year) - this is due to a variety of causes, namely biofuel diversion (10% of US grain currently; 30% of US corn by 2010); increase in oil price (and hence increased agricultural costs for fertilizer, running machinery, transport); drought impact on some local yields (e.g.  CIS, Africa and Australia; grain production at a historical peak); competition by Asian giants India and China on the global food market - and exacerbated by increasing demand for MEAT.

In January I took part in a BBC broadcast with 1998 Economics Nobel laureate Professor Amartya Sen (Harvard), medical historian Dr Sanjoy Bhattacharya (Wellcome Institute, University College London) and others about the 1943-1945 man-made and &quot;forgotten&quot; Bengal Famine that killed 6-7 million people in Bengal and adjacent provinces (see: http://www.open2.net/thingsweforgot/bengalfamine_programme.html , http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/2005/07/forgotten-holocaust-194344-bengal.html , http://janeaustenand.blogspot.com/ , http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ockham/stories/s19040.htm ) .

When the price of rice doubled and finally doubled again people who could not buy food died under a merciless British regime due to denial of what Professor Amartya Sen calls &quot;entitlement&quot; to food for survival.

Unfortunately the Bengal Famine is now being re-run in the Third World (history ignored yields history repeated) but potentially on a 100 fold greater scale - already the UN and FAO report that the impoverished 4 billions of the world are being priced out of the global  food market.

However it gets worse because biofuels are actually NOT CO2 neutral - whether it is fallow land or rain forest, the latest scientific studies say that there is a HUGE additional CO2 cost from diverting the land to growing the biofuel crops).

Thus US scientists (Drs Timothy Searchinger, Ralph Heimlich et al) in the top journal Science (February 2008) state: &quot;Using a worldwide agricultural model to estimate emissions from land use change, we found that corn-based ethanol, instead of producing a 20% savings, nearly doubles greenhouse emissions over 30 years and increases greenhouse gases for 167 years. Biofuels from switchgrass, if grown on U.S. corn lands, increase emissions by 50%. This result raises concerns about large biofuel mandates and highlights the value of using waste products.&quot;

The Biofuel perversion is mass murder in a globalized food market and with only a 25% efficiency in going from grain to chicken meat so is the luxury of meat-eating as the world enters a price-based  expansion of massive existing food deprivation that already kills 16 million people annually, 44,000 daily, 2/3 infants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the absolute amount of global food production is maximal, the price of grain has increased enormously in recent years (the price of wheat doubled in the last year) &#8211; this is due to a variety of causes, namely biofuel diversion (10% of US grain currently; 30% of US corn by 2010); increase in oil price (and hence increased agricultural costs for fertilizer, running machinery, transport); drought impact on some local yields (e.g.  CIS, Africa and Australia; grain production at a historical peak); competition by Asian giants India and China on the global food market &#8211; and exacerbated by increasing demand for MEAT.</p>
<p>In January I took part in a BBC broadcast with 1998 Economics Nobel laureate Professor Amartya Sen (Harvard), medical historian Dr Sanjoy Bhattacharya (Wellcome Institute, University College London) and others about the 1943-1945 man-made and &#8220;forgotten&#8221; Bengal Famine that killed 6-7 million people in Bengal and adjacent provinces (see: <a href="http://www.open2.net/thingsweforgot/bengalfamine_programme.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.open2.net/thingsweforgot/bengalfamine_programme.html</a> , <a href="http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/2005/07/forgotten-holocaust-194344-bengal.html" rel="nofollow">http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/2005/07/forgotten-holocaust-194344-bengal.html</a> , <a href="http://janeaustenand.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://janeaustenand.blogspot.com/</a> , <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ockham/stories/s19040.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ockham/stories/s19040.htm</a> ) .</p>
<p>When the price of rice doubled and finally doubled again people who could not buy food died under a merciless British regime due to denial of what Professor Amartya Sen calls &#8220;entitlement&#8221; to food for survival.</p>
<p>Unfortunately the Bengal Famine is now being re-run in the Third World (history ignored yields history repeated) but potentially on a 100 fold greater scale &#8211; already the UN and FAO report that the impoverished 4 billions of the world are being priced out of the global  food market.</p>
<p>However it gets worse because biofuels are actually NOT CO2 neutral &#8211; whether it is fallow land or rain forest, the latest scientific studies say that there is a HUGE additional CO2 cost from diverting the land to growing the biofuel crops).</p>
<p>Thus US scientists (Drs Timothy Searchinger, Ralph Heimlich et al) in the top journal Science (February 2008) state: &#8220;Using a worldwide agricultural model to estimate emissions from land use change, we found that corn-based ethanol, instead of producing a 20% savings, nearly doubles greenhouse emissions over 30 years and increases greenhouse gases for 167 years. Biofuels from switchgrass, if grown on U.S. corn lands, increase emissions by 50%. This result raises concerns about large biofuel mandates and highlights the value of using waste products.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Biofuel perversion is mass murder in a globalized food market and with only a 25% efficiency in going from grain to chicken meat so is the luxury of meat-eating as the world enters a price-based  expansion of massive existing food deprivation that already kills 16 million people annually, 44,000 daily, 2/3 infants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indigenous peoples researcher</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Indigenous peoples researcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 13:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up about this book. I&#039;m interested in seeing what they say about all of the new biodiesel development. It is causing tons of harm and displacement for indigenous peoples so that palm oil and soybean plantations can be developed - to feed the growing biodiesel need in the West. I just don&#039;t see it as a environmentally friendly alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up about this book. I&#8217;m interested in seeing what they say about all of the new biodiesel development. It is causing tons of harm and displacement for indigenous peoples so that palm oil and soybean plantations can be developed &#8211; to feed the growing biodiesel need in the West. I just don&#8217;t see it as a environmentally friendly alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenlevenson</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>kenlevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 04:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/03/07/book-review-climate-code-red-the-case-for-a-sustainability-emergency/#comment-599</guid>
		<description>To get busy fighting climate change in your own life download the Checklist Toward Zero Carbon.    www.checklisttowardzerocarbon.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To get busy fighting climate change in your own life download the Checklist Toward Zero Carbon.    <a href="http://www.checklisttowardzerocarbon.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.checklisttowardzerocarbon.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

