<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Black is not (always) Green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.green-blog.org/2008/02/15/black-is-not-always-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/02/15/black-is-not-always-green/</link>
	<description>The multi-author environment blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:39:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/02/15/black-is-not-always-green/comment-page-1/#comment-2651</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 05:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/02/15/black-is-not-always-green/#comment-2651</guid>
		<description>Good thread and I love the idea of the site.  
In regards to the black screen debate: It is true that a black screen LCD setting does not save the energy that an old CRT screen would for reasons mentioned above (the LCD back-light).  Further, I believe that there is a very small current applied to induce the black pigmentation and so one could argue that it in fact wastes energy to use black screen settings on an LCD.
However, when a black screen setting is used the LCD back-light intensity can be reduced as low as possible without sacrificing the legibility of text (if white text).  If it was possible to extinguish the back-light even further, even more energy could be saved (If anyone knows how to do this in windows I would love to know... my laptop only lets me dim the screen to a very low setting but three or four more stops would be even better.)  
Don&#039;t take anyone&#039;s word for it, test it yourself:  Time your battery duration at under normal preferences, then change your settings, dim the back-light and check duration again. let us know what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thread and I love the idea of the site.<br />
In regards to the black screen debate: It is true that a black screen LCD setting does not save the energy that an old CRT screen would for reasons mentioned above (the LCD back-light).  Further, I believe that there is a very small current applied to induce the black pigmentation and so one could argue that it in fact wastes energy to use black screen settings on an LCD.<br />
However, when a black screen setting is used the LCD back-light intensity can be reduced as low as possible without sacrificing the legibility of text (if white text).  If it was possible to extinguish the back-light even further, even more energy could be saved (If anyone knows how to do this in windows I would love to know&#8230; my laptop only lets me dim the screen to a very low setting but three or four more stops would be even better.)<br />
Don&#8217;t take anyone&#8217;s word for it, test it yourself:  Time your battery duration at under normal preferences, then change your settings, dim the back-light and check duration again. let us know what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aw</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/02/15/black-is-not-always-green/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>aw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 03:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/02/15/black-is-not-always-green/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately WHITE just hurt my eyes.

But what about the differences between Sleep and Hibernate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately WHITE just hurt my eyes.</p>
<p>But what about the differences between Sleep and Hibernate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackle.com does not necessarily use less energy than Google. &#124; Force Change</title>
		<link>http://www.green-blog.org/2008/02/15/black-is-not-always-green/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackle.com does not necessarily use less energy than Google. &#124; Force Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://green-blog.org/2008/02/15/black-is-not-always-green/#comment-551</guid>
		<description>[...] the problem it is replacing.  Therefore we were interested to come across this post at green-blog.org discussing the potential fallacy of the website blackle.com.  Blackle claims that because the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the problem it is replacing.  Therefore we were interested to come across this post at green-blog.org discussing the potential fallacy of the website blackle.com.  Blackle claims that because the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
